Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 23 2021 11:59am)

"none of the witnesses except the key one could come easily, and its not about DC its about other states, so lets move to texas"



yes presidential election fraud is "far removed" from DC :rofl:

but putting aside moving the case to Texas, which honestly i dont care about, why motion to dismiss the case when she claims she can prove election fraud (while also claiming no one can take her evidence seriously).

Quote (kenw @ Mar 23 2021 12:06pm)

I'd be incensed too if I were to be deemed unreasonable ( polite term for idiotic) by Trump's inner circle.

Quote (TiStuff @ Mar 23 2021 03:06pm)

if its all so dam above board how come they were not all fired up to go to court back then? now that time has passed that evidence could be covered up and the trails cold why are they now all of a sudden full of bluster?

ok then. why dont you start referencing from that link instead of your TV link
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20519858/3-22-21-sidney-powell-defending-the-republic-motion-to-dismiss-dominion.pdf
when your ready. you already have one lie racked up

Quote (TiStuff @ Mar 23 2021 02:06pm)

if its all so dam above board how come they were not all fired up to go to court back then? now that time has passed that evidence could be covered up and the trails cold why are they now all of a sudden full of bluster?

ok then. why dont you start referencing from that link instead of your TV link
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20519858/3-22-21-sidney-powell-defending-the-republic-motion-to-dismiss-dominion.pdf
when your ready. you already have one lie racked up

Quote

Both the United States and Colorado Supreme Courts also recognize that, in order to be
actionable, a statement must be capable of being proven true or false. “[A] statement of opinion
relating to matters of public concern which does not contain a provably false factual connotation,
or which cannot reasonably [be] interpreted as stating actual facts about an individual, continues
to receive full constitutional protection.” Keohane v. Stewart, 882 P.2d 1293, 1299 (Colo. 1994)
(quoting Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 18, 20 (1990)) (internal quotes and citations
omitted).
In Keohane, the Colorado Supreme Court identified a two-step inquiry to determine
whether a statement is protected. The first is whether the statement is “sufficiently factual to be
susceptible of being proved true or false.”

Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 23 2021 12:12pm)

all of those quotes are from Powell's motion to dismiss, not the TV article. its almost like u didnt read the motion at all. lol what a fail, i bet u feel silly. didnt even read and got exposed.

onto the next since u dont have any substance:

read enough to check out your claim about dismissal, no mention alternate idea to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
so you have at least on bullchit racked up

make your case per court document link instead of your tv link
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20519858/3-22-21-sidney-powell-defending-the-republic-motion-to-dismiss-dominion.pdf

Quote (kenw @ Mar 23 2021 12:12pm)

Dominion started sending imminent lawsuit letters in December . Your boy lost in November. Invent a better excuse. :)

Quote (TiStuff @ Mar 23 2021 02:24pm)

Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 23 2021 12:26pm)

fail post.

anyways i did counter that it should be moved with quotes from the court document, then said im fine with it moving to texas anyways, and moved on to part 2 of her motion, again with quotes from her motion.

so i guess u tap out?

Quote (TiStuff @ Mar 23 2021 02:28pm)

thats a fine argument nothing to do with your claims and your TV link
ya i call lefties frauds

Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 23 2021 12:29pm)

so now u want me to use the TV link and not the motion?

you seem to be in too far above ur head. let me know once u read the actual motion.