Republicanism: Federal judge appointed by Donald Trump in his last days of presidency Aileen Cannon couldnt even complete her resume/application correctly when applying for the judge position. Candidates are asked to cites 20 pieces of published articles they have completed in their career... Almost all she referenced were random articles written as a translation from english to spanish she did in some random spanish paper she was in during her college years, random articles she published like 'winners in the library quest competition' and 'tomatoes may reduce tumours'.. Nothing to do with any legal matters, which is what is expected to be included in this application...
She also had to include any public works she has done including reportss, memorandum., policy statements, any delivered policy discussions, or questions and answer sessions amongst other possible inclusions. She included 0 piece to this part of the application.
Only 4 cases she had that went to jury decision, which accounts to 14 days of trial experience in her life.
She made a case to prohibit the Doj from viewing the classified material before a special counsel was assigned. This went all the way to the highest district for appeals and won the appeal obviously. Pretty much every legal expert ever that commented on this decision said it was not lawful and really stupid
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/07/us/politics/aileen-cannon-judge-trump.htmlQuote ( Old back from Sep 2022)
On Monday, Judge Cannon granted Mr. Trump’s request to appoint an independent arbiter known as a special master to review materials seized last month from his private Florida club. The extraordinary and unusually broad decision, which could delay the criminal investigation into Mr. Trump, drew scrutiny from experts who questioned her legal reasoning and criticized some of the language in her opinion about what rights a former president is entitled to.
lmfao
This post was edited by Crunkt on Jul 7 2023 03:11pm