d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Clinton 2016 > Finally, A Thread For Winners
Prev1110111112113114183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,060
Joined: May 15 2010
Gold: 18,470.03
Sep 21 2016 04:00am
Quote (Skinned @ Sep 20 2016 07:25pm)
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/20/politics/george-hw-bush-hillary-clinton/index.html

Clinton endorsed by the last good Republican president.

Holy shit.

Wonder how Bush the Second feels.


No surprise here, they're all in bed with the Saudis. Bush 43 would be endorsing her too if they thought it'd help.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Sep 23 2016 01:20pm
Cincinnati Enquirer endorses Hillary Clinton for president, 1st time in nearly a century to not back Republican candidate.

http://www.cincinnati.com/story/opinion/editorials/2016/09/23/enquirer-endorses-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/90728344/




Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 23 2016 06:12pm
http://www.aarp.org/politics-society/government-elections/where-they-stand-election-2016.html

What would you do to address terrorism?

Quote
Hillary Clinton: Well, these are legitimate fears. I believe that people are rightly concerned about violence. Terrorism is part of that violence, and we have to do the best job we can to keep America safe. So I’ve laid out a very comprehensive plan about taking on the terrorists, going after them where they operate, doing everything we can to take away their territories so they can’t mastermind attacks from afar. But we also have to go after them online because that is where they recruit, radicalize and direct attacks. And we need to do a better job of getting there early, rooting out people who are vulnerable and preventing that from happening. But I’m looking at violence broadly.… It’s also why I’ve advocated gun-safety reform, like comprehensive background checks, closing the gun-show loophole, closing the online loophole—because, you know, it’s not only terrorists we need to be worried about. Terrorism is part of it, but gun violence kills 33,000 Americans a year...We’ve got to get serious about stemming violence and terrorism in every way we can.


herp durp take those gunz

any plans for pressure cooker control or to ban common items you find at Ace Hardware as well?
Member
Posts: 30,815
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 252.29
Sep 23 2016 06:16pm
President Trump is gonna REKT the hildebeast.
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Sep 23 2016 06:57pm
Quote (excellence @ Sep 23 2016 08:12pm)
http://www.aarp.org/politics-society/government-elections/where-they-stand-election-2016.html

What would you do to address terrorism?



herp durp take those gunz

any plans for pressure cooker control or to ban common items you find at Ace Hardware as well?


Oh no, she's trying to actually address the problem what a dope.
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Sep 23 2016 07:00pm
Background checks on new gun purchases is definitely the same as taking our guns, so true, so true

This post was edited by AiNedeSpelCzech on Sep 23 2016 07:00pm
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 23 2016 08:01pm
(C)linton demands 55-65% of your estate upon dying. Her NY mansions exempt from this.

Work hard all your life, sacrifice, take risks, get lucky, save and save and save and pay all those taxes, maybe to manage a 7-8 figure net worth upon death - only for Se(c) Clinton to say "good good hand 55-65% of it over"

A once self confessed brokeass now worth 9 figures without entering the private sector (besides the $250k/20 min wall street speeches to those she threatens to tax the most - :lol: )

Now this candidate wants even more of your money. "So you may ask why shes not ahead 50 points!!!!!"


Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Sep 23 2016 08:05pm
Member
Posts: 30,815
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 252.29
Sep 23 2016 09:09pm
Quote (excellence @ Sep 24 2016 02:01am)
(C)linton demands 55-65% of your estate upon dying. Her NY mansions exempt from this.

Work hard all your life, sacrifice, take risks, get lucky, save and save and save and pay all those taxes, maybe to manage a 7-8 figure net worth upon death - only for Se(c) Clinton to say "good good hand 55-65% of it over"

A once self confessed brokeass now worth 9 figures without entering the private sector (besides the $250k/20 min wall street speeches to those she threatens to tax the most - :lol: )

Now this candidate wants even more of your money. "So you may ask why shes not ahead 50 points!!!!!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EyoKB3ZHSc


Right to work means that you do not need to be a part of a union as a prerequisite to be hired for a job.

She's pretty fucked up if she's really against "right to work".

Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 23 2016 10:27pm
Quote (NekoSama @ 23 Sep 2016 23:09)
Right to work means that you do not need to be a part of a union as a prerequisite to be hired for a job.

She's pretty fucked up if she's really against "right to work".

working is for the lower class.
why work when you can have a charitable foundation to raise your net worth from zero to 100+ mil real quick
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1110111112113114183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll