Quote (fender @ Feb 15 2023 03:35am)
so just to be clear, you personally agree that trains with hazardous / flammable cargo should NOT be designated as such, and NOT be fitted with modern safety features that demonstrably lower the risk of derailment, other accidents, and the mitigate the potential damage in case of such an event?
in short, "this is fine" with you? companies cutting corners and endangering public safety to enrich their CEOs, privatising wins and socialising risks and losses is what you're all about - not because you benefit from it personally, or support it ideologically, but simply because tucker and friends tell you to. xD
Quote (Meanwhile @ Feb 15 2023 05:34am)
Would ECP brakes have reduced the severity of this accident? Yes
It reminds me the guns situation: this "debate" is a fail because these people will only be accept the truth when the carcinogen train will pop up right onto their face.
There's no proof that ECP brakes ARE that much better... on trains. The experts have been arguing about that for 8 years now.
Ofc I understand how YOU train experts might feel differently. LMFAO
There's also the fact that an axle failure caused the derailment... NOT the brakes.
But let's not let that slow you down in your orange man bad... mission. LOL