Using your own words against you isn't "copying the way you talk".

The vast majority of everything you have learned in life has been through second hand knowledge. You aren't saying there's "room for debate". You're either being contrarian for the sake of it, or you're being willfully obtuse.

If he/she turned that into a grifting career maybe they could move out of their mom's house. instead they do it for free on d2jsp.

That's exactly what I am saying. You just can't deal with it.


Or there is a 3rd option, which is rational skepticism.

For you to be only able to imagine two options, it tells me you are limited in both imagination and intelligence.

Yeah, I suppose there is a 3rd option: Being really fucking stupid.

In the face of overwhelming evidence (first-hand experience, photographic, survivors' stories, and so on), skepticism is no longer rational.

I mean, FFS...Ghot shot down the lie in the OP that ballpoint pens didn't exist in the early 1940s. The entire premise for this thread is a fucking lie from a fucking Nazi.

Someone as stupid as you doesn't get to decide whether skepticism is rational or not.



You seem emotionally involved in this debate, judging by your profuse swearing.

This post was edited by JessiWan on Dec 6 2022 02:41pm

I didn't say you were less intelligent for swearing. I said it reveals that you are emotionally involved.

I don't think you know how to read.

if there were 1 million sources you'd still be "skeptical", because you're not skeptical, you're a contrarian.

the defining characteristic that separates them is admission you're wrong when proven wrong. that's something you don't do often, and never do without an excuse.

You literally said this in the same post:



Get fucked.