That's very close to cloning, which is illegal in a lot of countries.

Cloning is legal in the US and a couple using an artificial womb wouldn't be cloning anyways.

fraud leftie always needs some kind of misdirection

your link would be cloning and its your link she is referring to

Please read the entire conversation. You are taking what I said out of context and I can see why it does not make sense to you.

I never said that the procedure in the SingularityHub article wasn't cloning because it's debatable whether it is or isn't.

I said that the artificial wombs from the Metro.co.uk article were not cloning and also said that cloning isn't illegal in the US.

I would personally argue that if a couple used both procedures, that it wouldn't be cloning because the artificial egg will still be required to be fertilized, so the offspring will be unique.

Maybe there's something that could work involving self fertilization, but I'm going to be honest with you, I don't really know anything about how that works in humans other than it's pretty rare.

i have been following the conversation.

Quote (mki @ Dec 13 2022 08:33pm)
Realistically yes, but theoretically no.

https://singularityhub.com/2021/03/23/scientists-created-an-artificial-early-embryo-from-human-skin-cells/


That's very close to cloning, which is illegal in a lot of countries.
(direct response to your link)


Quote (JessiWan @ 14 Dec 2022 10:03)
That's very close to cloning, which is illegal in a lot of countries.


Cloning is legal in the US and a couple using an artificial womb wouldn't be cloning anyways.
(direct response to her direct response to your link)

now if you want to say you where unclear i could entertain that idea

posted already?