Quote (addone @ Jan 29 2022 05:31pm)

There are many tangents here.

1. Child is considered under 16 and anything over 16 is considered adult for consent purposes. Stop saying child prostitution it's not. If the age of consent is too low then raise it don't need your emotional soyspergers
2. It's prostitution OMG straight to jail!! Well technically it isn't because then it would make me buying a drink to hook up with a woman is considered prostitution also. This whole trial will hinge on this point.
3. Is using another person, paying them to look for female companions considered sex trafficing? What about using any dating/sex app? Aren't you paying someone to link you with a sexual partner also? Oh wait definition of sex trafficking?

"Sex trafficking is human trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation. It has been called a form of modern slavery because of the way victims are forced into sexual acts, usually non-consensually, in a form of sexual slavery."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_trafficking

4. It's a political trial due to him uploading IlhanOmarDna.com No one care about him being with those females for 1.5 years but on the day he was uploading some political dirt he got instantly raided by FBI. Coincidence rofl?
5. If age of consent is to be updated then make it absolutely non debate proof. Two 16 and 17 is okay but 17 and 35 is not, what about 26 guy and a 73 woman is that considered gold digging form of prostitution also? Make up your minds. It's either legal or it's not so stfu opinions, facts don't care about your feelings.

Consentual adults with gifts is not child sext trafficking. What it really boils down to is young gold diggers use a horny rich 30 year old who is made into a political target by the leftist swamp demons as a pedo

Quote (Skinned @ Jan 30 2022 11:41am)

^^ The real pizzagate right here

If Epstein was a Republican Congressman you all would be defending him lmao.

Quote (addone @ Jan 29 2022 02:31pm)

Quote (addone @ Jan 29 2022 02:48pm)

No because Epstein was involved with girls below 16. Facts don't care about your feelings sry

Quote (Sioux @ Jan 29 2022 04:49pm)

So is the person you're breathlessly defending you dunce

Quote (Sioux @ Jan 30 2022 11:49am)

So is the person you're breathlessly defending you dunce

Quote (addone @ Jan 29 2022 04:48pm)

No because Epstein was involved with girls below 16 and he abused them. Facts don't care about your feelings sry

Quote (Goomshill @ Jan 29 2022 01:50pm)

I think defining relationships is what gets in the mess in the first place. Until now, the government tried to stay out of ambiguities and only criminalize direct cash-paid prostitution and unambiguous age of consent laws. They'd catch johns by setting up sting operations and arrest someone as soon as money changed hands, and they'd arrest people who slept with underage girls because age is a provable number. When the government starts trying to define the vague nature of relationships and economic conditions and gets into topics like gift giving and implied expectations, they're delving deep into the realm of reasonable doubt and trying to set up criterion that would criminalize innocent relationships between normal people.
When the law is working like it should, the bounds of criminality shouldn't be vague. If she's below the age of consent, its illegal. If they agree to an exchange of cash for sex, its illegal.

Until now those sugar daddy sites existed by exploiting that vagueness and toeing that line, but that's just a natural consequence of any law that tries to set discrete boundaries on otherwise muddle concepts.