Quote (net @ Oct 11 2021 08:51pm)
You posted a source about EARLY finding and suggestions this may be the case. The problem with your argument once again is that data in science changes and the way you handle the virus does as well, but when that happens you get overly skeptical about it as if it’s them attempting to control you.
And sure you can try to discredit all sources that way but when the same source you said has this in the same piece of info you posted:
PHE has labelled the variant "under investigation" but has not declared it a "variant of concern" - a designation that can trigger strong policy responses.
"There is preliminary laboratory evidence to suggest that vaccination and previous infection may be less effective at preventing infection with (B.1.621)," it said, adding there had been 37 confirmed cases of the variant in England.
"However, this data is very limited and more research is required. There is no evidence to suggest that (it) is more transmissible than the dominant Delta variant."
So you could either discredit entirely or… wait for them to actually confirm or deny findings like a logical person instead of jumping on a boat