Quote (sir_lance_bb @ May 4 2021 07:31am)
Anyone who tells themselves the advantages of being XY can be removed to have fair play of competing against XX is willfully ignoring entire fields of biological data.
The idea that people could convince themselves that Test levels somehow corrects or puts an XY on even playing field as XX just doesn't understand the biological reality of strength and athletics.
And this just isn't about puberty, XY people are born with more strength and athletic ability on average than XX.
Testosterone exposure essentially has almost lifelong lasting effects. And it's not even just tied into muscle fibers but tons of neurological factors. This should be obvious when XX who put in considerable muscle mass will not be as strong on average as XY who have the same amount of muscle mass.
So XY is exposed to Testosterone during fetal development which causes changes that won't ever be undone. Then the reality is very few trans people are going have avoided a puberty phase of increased levels of Test do the the onset of XY puberty which will be another compounded factor. And the idea that this is something that could be undone willfully ignores the data that shows this exposure has almost permanent lasting changes to muscle/bone mass and neuro muscular efficiency that will only diminish essentially with age.
There's an argument to be made that people who have taken PEDs in sport have essentially given themselves career long advantages over others even if they were to only use them till they get caught or only took them for a period because the body has "muscle memory" so you have a higher baseline that you can train up to than someone who would have not.
That said, I don't really care or think it matters except maybe for combat or violent sports activities potentially. But it is weird that there's people who are trying to willfully ignore and frame this discussion to think there could be a fair encompassing solution to having XY compete in XX sports.
also the argument from feminists tends to go "sure, men are stronger, and faster because that's a function of strength, but accuracy is asexual. anything athletically that isn't a function of raw strength is equal."
but look at disc golf, men drive 500-600 feet, women 300-400. so follows the pattern still, men are stronger. but putting men still grossly dominate. "circle 1 putting" 35 feet and under, requires no raw strength. its the threshold for a short makeable putt for a pro. top 10 men players average 80-100%, top 10 women average 40-60%.
women are worse at darts, pool, mini golf, and just about any game where strength isnt a factor.
turns out, to the surprise of no one logical, that millions of years of keenly hunting prey in the wild whilst women tended to children, processed animals, and cooked, men have stronger senses of sight in the context of hand eye coordination.
there never will be a fair sport for both sexes, ever, men are always better. its really just that simple. the closest thing are things like SUPER long distance swimming or ultra marathons. where buoyancy of increased fat pockets or increased energy storage from those fat pockets allow women to edge out men. even there the sample size is too small to really say, but data supports the idea.
i recall people saying "gymnastics" when america was sweeping the Olympics, but men are far better at that too.
Quote (Skinned @ May 4 2021 08:56am)
High school sports is about learning teamwork and building character.
Anyone here besides me ever actually play sports?
i lettered 9 times in highschool sports, and im also undefeated at bean bag toss in my backyard.
This post was edited by thesnipa on May 4 2021 08:00am