Is that why Trump made significant inroads with the Hispanic vote in 2020?

Way to stereotype an entire racial bloc.

more in common? sure. more objectively relevant things in common? absolutely.

the thing in common that republican voters ACTUALLY (are made to) care about, which is skin colour? nop, and that's why elections are still somewhat close...

This is a conversation about voter fraud

Learn your place and understand that you know nothing about the issue befure you open ur mouth and spew alex jones level nonsense

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Feb 24 2021 12:30pm

Oh aren't we giving these people the benefit of the doubt? My bad I gotcha. Yeah then no, they're NOTHING alike.



Oh you're one of those that get baited into taking a side on a non-issue so as to distract you from the bigger picture. I see. Carry on then. Biden stole the election!!!

Tell me one thing the Democrats have ever done to benefit third world immigrants.

letting them into the USA

It's tragic that you're so indoctrinated.
It's not about whites vs immigrants or republicans vs democrats. It's about poor vs rich. Being safe and comfortable in your middle class does not make you rich. Stop worrying about the people below you "stealing" your crumbs and start worrying about the ones above you eating your cake.

That's a good point, but I suppose we'll never know, because the Danes lack the testicular fortitude to take their education to the next level. You have to put your money where your mouth is.

You are thinking about the bold the entirely wrong way around. Progressive tax schemes don't create poverty, they alleviate it, albeit at the expense of general wealth. The United States should probably do a bit more, Denmark should probably do a bit less, but I don't see what this has to do with whether or not the United States is a "first world" country. It is the richest non-tax haven in the world (PPP) outside of 5 million Norwegians living large on a trillion dollar oil fund. For a country that is a continent unto itself, I think that's impressive. We compare the United States only to the richest European nations, in highly developed enclaves far better off than their poorer European neighbors. If we were to compare like for like (Norway = Massachusetts, Denmark = Connecticut), this wouldn't even be a conversation.

But in all seriousness, unless we are willing to designate Austria, France, and others as impoverished, underdeveloped states, there is really no intellectual basis for claiming that the United States is not first world.

And id rather ive in alabama than poland.

theyrethesamepicture.jpg