d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Abortion 2021
Prev1101112131418Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Jan 31 2021 07:37pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jan 31 2021 05:04pm)
What do you mean by "viable life"? A mole is just as viable even if it doesn't turn into a "normal" human. It's got its own DNA, often its own organs, teeth, hair, etc. What's the separating factor that leads you to say one is "viable" and the other isn't?

Suppose the fetus would be born but live in pain and never live past 5 years old? Is that viable? I think you would say yes. So where is the line drawn where something is "viable"?

The answer you will inevitably dance around but won't admit is that one has a brain and develops consciousness and the other doesn't.


its pretty straightforward:

Quote
Molar pregnancy
Also called: hydatidiform mole
A noncancerous tumor that develops in the uterus as a result of a nonviable pregnancy.


Quote
From a clinical perspective, a viable pregnancy is one in which the baby can be born and have a reasonable chance of survival. By contrast, a nonviable pregnancy is one in which the fetus or baby has no chance of being born alive.


a nonviable pregnancy always leads to miscarriage, a viable pregnancy will usually lead to a baby. consciousness may usually be a difference, but that is not the defining difference.


my guess is youre just parroting liberal talking points without actually knowing what they mean.


a viable pregnancy is human life from the time it becomes viable, which would be fertilization/implantation. the usual circumstance from that point is to be born as a baby. a non-viable pregnancy is no different than any other clump of cells - it has zero chance of being born as a baby.
Member
Posts: 24,802
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 22,202.22
Jan 31 2021 07:44pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jan 31 2021 05:25pm)
At that point the safest way to "abort" the fetus is just to induce birth and take care of it. Happens pretty frequently when there's complications.


thats an induction not an abortion. abortion, by definition, means killing the fetus. i dont think anyone is against inducing when theres complications. the issue is late term abortions, when you could have induced or done something else.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jan 31 2021 07:54pm
Quote (Kayeto @ 1 Feb 2021 02:33)
How come there is so much discussion about what to do with unwanted pregnancies once we have them, but very little discussion on how to prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place?

Unwanted pregnancies are a problem, regardless how they turn out. Terminating an unwanted pregnancy does not solve the problem. In fact, it might even proliferate the root problem, since easy access to termination means that people have less incentive to avoid creating the problem.

I'm not against some discussion about what to do about unwanted pregnancies once we have them. I just wonder why there is no discussion about how to address the root problem.


one of the core issues in regards to abortions in america is that there's a HUGE overlap of people who are anti-choice / pro-birth for 'moral' and religious reasons, and for the same reasons oppose some of the most effective methods to prevent unwanted pregnancies in he first place, such as comprehensive sex education, or access to birth control.

it's mindblowing how widespread and impactful religious zealotry and sexual prudery are in america. just the other day i read about a christian school that kicked an 8 year old girl out because she claimed to have a crush on another girl... insane, isn't it?
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 31 2021 08:09pm
Quote (ReturnFormer @ Jan 31 2021 08:44pm)
thats an induction not an abortion. abortion, by definition, means killing the fetus. i dont think anyone is against inducing when theres complications. the issue is late term abortions, when you could have induced or done something else.


It amazes me how much Liberals care about situations that happen 0.0000001% of the time.
Member
Posts: 22,440
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Jan 31 2021 08:10pm
Quote (Kayeto @ Jan 31 2021 05:33pm)
How come there is so much discussion about what to do with unwanted pregnancies once we have them, but very little discussion on how to prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place?

Unwanted pregnancies are a problem, regardless how they turn out. Terminating an unwanted pregnancy does not solve the problem. In fact, it might even proliferate the root problem, since easy access to termination means that people have less incentive to avoid creating the problem.

I'm not against some discussion about what to do about unwanted pregnancies once we have them. I just wonder why there is no discussion about how to address the root problem.


It's because the most-effective strategies for reducing unwanted pregnancy are overwhelmingly opposed by people who are anti-abortion.
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 31 2021 08:34pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Jan 31 2021 09:10pm)
It's because the most-effective strategies for reducing unwanted pregnancy are overwhelmingly opposed by people who are anti-abortion.



Biggest abortion-reducing measures would be abolishing divorce and welfare.

Crybaby lib T’s complain whenever they hear it though.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 31 2021 08:38pm
Quote (ReturnFormer @ Jan 31 2021 07:37pm)
its pretty straightforward:

a nonviable pregnancy always leads to miscarriage, a viable pregnancy will usually lead to a baby. consciousness may usually be a difference, but that is not the defining difference.

my guess is youre just parroting liberal talking points without actually knowing what they mean.

a viable pregnancy is human life from the time it becomes viable, which would be fertilization/implantation. the usual circumstance from that point is to be born as a baby. a non-viable pregnancy is no different than any other clump of cells - it has zero chance of being born as a baby.


By your definition of viable a mole is viable because it can be born alive via C-section same as an ectopic pregnancy.

and, if that is your definition then a pregnancy is only "viable" once its something like 8 weeks. The majority of pregnancies terminate before they are ever known about.


I guarantee I know more about the different ways a pregnancy can go wrong than you will ever know. That comment is just more of you needing to find fault in the person speaking because you can't defend your position.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jan 31 2021 08:48pm
Member
Posts: 22,440
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Jan 31 2021 08:52pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Jan 31 2021 06:34pm)
Biggest abortion-reducing measures would be abolishing divorce and welfare.

Crybaby lib T’s complain whenever they hear it though.


Actually the biggest reducing measure would be to be gay, but you faggots can't stop breeding.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jan 31 2021 09:07pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Jan 31 2021 08:52pm)
Actually the biggest reducing measure would be to be gay, but you faggots can't stop breeding.


It's not my fault my dad made me play baseball and told me how to not be a communist
Member
Posts: 57,118
Joined: Nov 7 2009
Gold: 2,195.68
Jan 31 2021 09:16pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Jan 31 2021 09:52pm)
Actually the biggest reducing measure would be to be gay, but you faggots can't stop breeding.


we need state enforced homosexuality
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1101112131418Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll