d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Next Supreme Court Justice
Prev1101112131442Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 22 2020 03:23pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Sep 22 2020 03:44pm)
still none of what u said in that rant has anything to do with my point that biden just panders to extremists.

if u want to legitimize a group with a few kiosks and gofundme's because they scare u tho, go ahead.


Okay dude. Lol.

Yeah having them represented at the DNC has a lot to do with Biden and the Democratic party. They held a memorial for GEORGE FLOYD -- who is the posterchild of BLM. And kneeled for 8+ minutes in his honor on Live TV, demanding a stop to systemic racism. I just a clip of Kamala Harris say we need to end systemic racism the other day again.

Well considering they've gone through residential areas, threatened, beaten, and killed people, engaged in extortion, mass vandalism, 550+ riots, and accumulated over 1 billion dollar in riot damage (and I'll say, it's not that every supporter of the movement engages in riot/violence -- but there's a lot that have, including a leader that called looting "reparations". And a refusal of the organization to call for a stop to violence on many occasions.) They've also called for abolishing the police and have gotten cities to defund their police departments, resulting in increased crime. They have speakers with microphones calling for violence and the crowd just claps? Pretty messed up.

Yet strangely, you never really see similar results to these levels occuring at any Back the Blue Rally, MAGA Rally or anything.

Biden has never once called that organization out by name to condemn it, despite the fact that the group is radicalizing people through it's mantra and creating violence.

This post was edited by GLYC123 on Sep 22 2020 03:33pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Sep 22 2020 04:03pm
Quote (GLYC123 @ Sep 22 2020 01:37pm)
There's absolutely nothing wrong with what I posted, which is why you didn't make any legitimate rebuttal of any of my points.

I will happily be voting for Trump and be standing on the right side of history with that vote.


There is because it's not based in reality or fact. You can find statements of Biden condemning riots for MONTHS. Here's one on May 30th: https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1266949697874415618. On June 2, he said that there's no place in this country for looting, violence, etc. Watch that here: https://youtu.be/wfiZy4xvhu4?t=94. I mean seriously, how fucking hard is it to do a simple Google search on these things? How fucking lazy are you? Are you one of those gullible people who buys pills to make your dick bigger?

As for the Green New Deal, he obviously doesn't support all the nonsensical things. You can learn more by, you know, looking at his plan: https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/
Compare that to the GND and you'll see a world of difference.

Do I need to go on about voting, SCOTUS, BLM, etc. too? Do I need to get some polling data? I'm not trying to be a dick here, but you're either incredibly gullible or lazy. It's one thing to look at a bunch of facts and come to a different conclusion. That's perfectly normal and healthy. It's another thing to repeat easily debunked lies.

Edit: ty excellence

This post was edited by thundercock on Sep 22 2020 04:08pm
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 22 2020 04:05pm
Quote (thundercock @ 22 Sep 2020 18:03)
There is because it's not based in reality or fact. You can find statements of Biden condemning riots for MONTHS. Here's one on May 30th: https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1266949697874415618. On June 2, he said that there's no place in this country for looting, violence, etc. Watch that here: https://youtu.be/wfiZy4xvhu4?t=94. I mean seriously, how fucking hard is it to do a simple Google search on these things? How fucking lazy are you? Are you one of those gullible people who buys pills to make your dick bigger?

As for the Green New Deal, he obviously doesn't support all the nonsensical things. You can learn more by, you know, looking at his plan: https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/
Compare that to the GND and you'll see a world of difference.

Do I need to go on about voting, SCOTUS, BLM, etc. too? Do I need to get some polling data? I'm not trying to be a dick here, but you're either incredibly gullible or lazy. It's one thing to look at a bunch of facts and come to a different conclusion. That's perfectly normal and healthy. It's another thing to repeat easily debunked lies.


page doesn’t exist on the twitter link, just like most of biden’s campaign so far.

maybe that’s because “150 million americans have died from gun violence and 200 million from covid”, per Biden himself

e: that youtube link, who the hell is George Flores??!?!?!

This post was edited by excellence on Sep 22 2020 04:06pm
Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 22 2020 04:22pm
Quote (excellence @ Sep 22 2020 05:05pm)
page doesn’t exist on the twitter link, just like most of biden’s campaign so far.

maybe that’s because “150 million americans have died from gun violence and 200 million from covid”, per Biden himself

e: that youtube link, who the hell is George Flores??!?!?!


Joe Biden's solution to gun violence is basically just to get rid of guns. He's called for a ban of AR-15s and Hi-Capacity Magazines.

Listed here in the Joe Biden campaign website. https://joebiden.com/gunsafety/#

Additionally, there's this.



Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 22 2020 04:35pm
Quote (thundercock @ Sep 22 2020 05:03pm)
There is because it's not based in reality or fact. You can find statements of Biden condemning riots for MONTHS. Here's one on May 30th: https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1266949697874415618. On June 2, he said that there's no place in this country for looting, violence, etc. Watch that here: https://youtu.be/wfiZy4xvhu4?t=94. I mean seriously, how fucking hard is it to do a simple Google search on these things? How fucking lazy are you? Are you one of those gullible people who buys pills to make your dick bigger?

As for the Green New Deal, he obviously doesn't support all the nonsensical things. You can learn more by, you know, looking at his plan: https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/
Compare that to the GND and you'll see a world of difference.

Do I need to go on about voting, SCOTUS, BLM, etc. too? Do I need to get some polling data? I'm not trying to be a dick here, but you're either incredibly gullible or lazy. It's one thing to look at a bunch of facts and come to a different conclusion. That's perfectly normal and healthy. It's another thing to repeat easily debunked lies.

Edit: ty excellence


You're right, I guess he did condemn some of the riots -- which he still has never condemned Black Lives Matter and just recently condemned Antifa -- which I'll applaud him for now, but he's definitely months too late, he did this in September. We've had 100 of nights of riots in Portland. I guess the message gets lost when you see him credit legitimate use of force cases as "systemic racism" and throwing the police under the bus.

His staff also bailed out rioters and violent offenders in Minneapolis.

https://www.newsbreak.com/minnesota/minneapolis/news/1613249543666/kamala-harris-supported-minneapolis-freedom-fund-bailed-out-dangerous-criminals-along-with-protesters

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-08-26/joe-biden-jacob-blake

What's your information on BLM? 93% Peaceful protests? Yet, resulting in the largest riot damage in the history of the United States.

Can't say Green New Deal is my top priority in today's era. I'm pro clean green, but,

"1) establishes an enforcement mechanism that includes milestone targets no later than the end of his first term in 2025"

So. AOC has already said she wants to pressure Joe Biden. So he basically just extended the date out to 2050 versus the original that was, 2030 (I believe)? I believe with 0% emissions.

Can't say I trust for these guys to be successful -- obviously that's an opinion but California's already been going through some rolling blackouts. It seems like right now, the top priority should be economy.

This post was edited by GLYC123 on Sep 22 2020 05:00pm
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Sep 22 2020 05:25pm
Interesting info someone posted in the twitter feed of Romney's statement:
https://mobile.twitter.com/SenatorRomney/status/1308403638897958914

Quote
The precedent was set starting in 1818. There have been 29 SCOTUS nominations in election years. 19 same party and 10 opposing party. 17 of 19 confirmed and 8 of 10 not confirmed. Precedent did not start in 2016
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Sep 22 2020 05:28pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 22 2020 07:25pm)
Interesting info someone posted in the twitter feed of Romney's statement:
https://mobile.twitter.com/SenatorRomney/status/1308403638897958914


All around good statement by Romney.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Sep 22 2020 07:19pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 22 2020 04:25pm)
Interesting info someone posted in the twitter feed of Romney's statement:
https://mobile.twitter.com/SenatorRomney/status/1308403638897958914


Which is another way of saying "elections have consequences." Don't like it? Too bad!

Quote (bogie160 @ Sep 22 2020 04:28pm)
All around good statement by Romney.


Agreed. I like where his head is at.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 22 2020 10:24pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 22 Sep 2020 19:25)
Interesting info someone posted in the twitter feed of Romney's statement:
https://mobile.twitter.com/SenatorRomney/status/1308403638897958914


Quote (bogie160 @ 22 Sep 2020 19:28)
All around good statement by Romney.


Quote (thundercock @ 22 Sep 2020 21:19)
Which is another way of saying "elections have consequences." Don't like it? Too bad!



Agreed. I like where his head is at.


according to the lefties, history started in 2016, and Romney’s impeachment vote is null and void. he is back to being a reich-winger who only votes for party :rolleyes:

the real question is why didn’t RGB retire when she had an 8-year opportunity to have Obama name her successor. Didn’t want a minority male picking her successor? She did only have like one minority law clerk after all

This post was edited by excellence on Sep 22 2020 10:26pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Sep 23 2020 12:03am
Quote (excellence @ Sep 22 2020 09:24pm)
according to the lefties, history started in 2016, and Romney’s impeachment vote is null and void. he is back to being a reich-winger who only votes for party :rolleyes:

the real question is why didn’t RGB retire when she had an 8-year opportunity to have Obama name her successor. Didn’t want a minority male picking her successor? She did only have like one minority law clerk after all


It's because she wanted to server until she was no longer able to serve. I'll give credit where credit is due.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1101112131442Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll