d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Almost One Mass Shooting A Day In Us > .98 Per Day On Average
Prev1101112131429Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,373
Joined: Sep 14 2009
Gold: 5.70
Nov 9 2018 02:00pm
Member
Posts: 40,248
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 5,737.99
Nov 9 2018 02:11pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Nov 8 2018 01:24pm)
I don't think you can blame the NRA for this stuff. They certainly play a role in making firearms more accessible, but to draw a direct link between that lobbyism and these gun violence episodes is quite a leap as there are many steps involved. Perhaps they should receive partial blame, but gun violence in America is a complicated, deep-rooted problem that probably has a lot of complicated factors involved.

And we have had serious discussions about gun violence. We are just struggling to figure out how to solve something so complicated. Taking all the guns away isn't going to work. Implementing more background and safety checks might decrease these mass shootings a little, but I think many would probably be surprised by how little. There's a lot of shit going on here.

Agree’d. We need to be having sensible conversations about gun violence. Contributing it all to the NRA is some low information nonsense.
Member
Posts: 15,278
Joined: Mar 24 2009
Gold: 2,234.00
Nov 9 2018 02:21pm
Quote (Kamahl16 @ Nov 9 2018 01:44pm)
Not true.


Okay how else would you stop a bad guy with a gun? Also how would it not be a Constitutional crisis if the government bans all guns and forces confiscation from its citizens?
Member
Posts: 6,828
Joined: Mar 21 2018
Gold: 0.00
Nov 9 2018 02:23pm
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Nov 9 2018 03:11pm)
Agree’d. We need to be having sensible conversations about gun violence. Contributing it all to the NRA is some low information nonsense.



Lobbying is an even bigger discussion to be had and directly influences policy more than popular opinion.
You’re saying the NRA is a small fraction, but if you add it all up -- candidate and party contributions, independent expenditures, and lobbying -- the NRA has spent $203.2 million on political activities since 1998.
That’s a lot of bankroll for politicians to make sure they keep making money off of their private deals.
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 9 2018 02:25pm
Quote (Kamahl16 @ Nov 9 2018 01:44pm)
Not true.


lol which half isnt true?
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 9 2018 04:37pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 8 Nov 2018 16:04)
want to have a serious discussion about gun control? ok, just answer these two questions, and admittedly subquestions.

1.) Democrats regularly call for "training classes" being required to buy a gun, so that owners are more responsible. What percent of Democratic gun owners do you think have taken Hunter's safety or a similar training class? Followup, answer the same for republicans. Lastly, answer for both parties when it comes to hands on training from family members, as opposed to going to a store and just buying a gun.

2.) What percent of violent gun crimes do you think are committed by Democrats, as compared to Republicans. What percent of violent crimes with illegally obtained guns are committed by democrats, versus republicans?


put the two together and you'll have a logical reason why the GOP doesnt want to have the talk. It's a discussion so that Democrats can take guns from everyone so they can stop the Democratic criminals who don't get training and overwhelmingly own the illegal firearms supply in this country. Meanwhile Republicans overwhelmingly take more training classes and own far less % of the illegal guns. Democrats can't police themselves, so they come after everyone, then blame the other side for not helping them police themselves.

If racism and misogyny are a right winged problem, that the right wing is responsible for changing, then gun issues are a left wing problem, and they're responsible for fixing it. so far they have no ideas on how to change their own stats without putting a chokehold on everyone.


i don't know. what are the percentages? do you have a source for that kind of stuff because i tried to google it and couldn't find anything...
Member
Posts: 6,544
Joined: Jan 17 2010
Gold: 3.33
Nov 9 2018 04:49pm
Quote (fender @ Nov 9 2018 04:37pm)
i don't know. what are the percentages? do you have a source for that kind of stuff because i tried to google it and couldn't find anything...



How many camo-wearing, ex-military, religious, employed* chubby old dudes that live in the suburbs/rural areas are mowing people down in schools, the inner city, or in drug turf wars?

Because that’s whose gun you want to take.

This post was edited by FGdumpster on Nov 9 2018 04:52pm
Member
Posts: 180
Joined: Sep 19 2018
Gold: 1.00
Nov 9 2018 05:05pm
Only around 40000 injuries + deaths combined per year, nothing compared to some things like heart disease.

When the number gets up to 7 figures then it would be an issue. Right now the media just wants to use ‘mass shootings’ to sensationalize headlines and stir up gun control politics.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 9 2018 05:06pm
Quote (FGdumpster @ 9 Nov 2018 23:49)
How many camo-wearing, ex-military, religious, employed* chubby old dudes that live in the suburbs/rural areas are mowing people down in schools, the inner city, or in drug turf wars?

Because that’s who’s gun you want to take.


that doesn't really answer my question for sources, but it's an interesting approach. how many of those boxes would you have to check to keep your guns? young people (which age exactly?) and people who never served don't get to keep them according to your 'plan'? no guns for atheists and slim people?

wasn't the latest shooter an ex marine? the vegas shooter was old and chubby, and likely fulfilled some more of your criteria - it almost seems like you're not really proposing an actual solution, but rather vaguely suggesting that only certain types of people should be protected by the 2nd amendment...
Member
Posts: 6,544
Joined: Jan 17 2010
Gold: 3.33
Nov 9 2018 05:08pm
Quote (fender @ Nov 9 2018 05:06pm)
that doesn't really answer my question for sources, but it's an interesting approach. how many of those boxes would you have to check to keep your guns? young people (which age exactly?) and people who never served don't get to keep them according to your 'plan'? no guns for atheists and slim people?

wasn't the latest shooter an ex marine? the vegas shooter was old and chubby, and likely fulfilled some more of your criteria - it almost seems like you're not really proposing an actual solution, but rather vaguely suggesting that only certain types of people should be protected by the 2nd amendment...



I’m showing the absurdity of removing essential freedoms to save a statistically insignificant amount of lives. You’d be better off banning cars and forcing people to ride bicycles and trains. More lives would be saved, if that’s truly your goal.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1101112131429Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll