d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Censorship Thread
Prev11011121314124Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 24 2018 12:08pm
here i was thinking that wasn't a white supremacist symbol, just a bunch of gay dudes openly signalling they're a hole ready to be plundered.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 24 2018 12:44pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 24 Sep 2018 14:08)
here i was thinking that wasn't a white supremacist symbol, just a bunch of gay dudes openly signalling they're a hole ready to be plundered.

i dont think the missus would be happy with said thoughts :rofl:
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 24 2018 12:51pm
Quote (excellence @ Sep 24 2018 12:44pm)
i dont think the missus would be happy with said thoughts :rofl:


when i asked my wife what she'd do if i got a tinder profile, she said make me delete it and counseling. when i asked her the same about grinder she said divorce. so i have to agree. lol
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 24 2018 02:36pm
they want you dead

Member
Posts: 9,011
Joined: Feb 24 2006
Gold: 1,551.00
Sep 24 2018 04:00pm

Quote
After Linux Foundation board members passed the new "Code of Conduct" it has sparked outrage and many criticisms among the FOSS community.

The Code of Conduct - now referred to as CoC - is full of buzzwords and vague language that can give vocal groups the power to suppress other developers.

It drives the development hierarchy away from a meritocracy and inserts politics into development and administrative decisions. The CoC aims to promote unity as its underlying message but will only lead to division.

https://www.change.org/p/repeal-the-linux-foundation-s-code-of-conduct
Member
Posts: 9,011
Joined: Feb 24 2006
Gold: 1,551.00
Sep 24 2018 10:11pm
:rolleyes:
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Sep 25 2018 03:09pm
https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/topics/company/2018/Creating-new-policies-together.html

Quote
For the last three months, we have been developing a new policy to address dehumanizing language on Twitter. Language that makes someone less than human can have repercussions off the service, including normalizing serious violence. Some of this content falls within our hateful conduct policy (which prohibits the promotion of violence against or direct attacks or threats against other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease), but there are still Tweets many people consider to be abusive, even when they do not break our rules. Better addressing this gap is part of our work to serve a healthy public conversation.

With this change, we want to expand our hateful conduct policy to include content that dehumanizes others based on their membership in an identifiable group, even when the material does not include a direct target. Many scholars have examined the relationship between dehumanization and violence. For example, Susan Benesch has described dehumanizing language as a hallmark of dangerous speech, because it can make violence seem acceptable, and Herbert Kelman has posited that dehumanization can reduce the strength of restraining forces against violence./quote]
Member
Posts: 54,174
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Sep 25 2018 03:42pm
Quote (Beowulf @ 25 Sep 2018 23:09)


long story short: we're increasing censorship for certain reasons.

whether twitter will enforce this new policy equally aggressively against "dehumanizing language" targetting conservative "identifiable groups" as against dehumanizing language coming from conservative groups, will determine if their pompous rationalization was serious - or if it was just a lame excuse to ramp up censorship of groups whose views they dont agree with, i.e. conservatives.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 25 2018 03:43pm
Member
Posts: 50,901
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Sep 26 2018 06:26am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 25 2018 03:42pm)
long story short: we're increasing censorship for certain reasons.


fuck needing 'reasons'

Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 26 2018 06:33am
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 26 2018 06:26am)


here i thought the bland "violated rules" justification was bad. blank is worse tho

twitter sounds like blizzard, when u ask why your account was banned you basically get back a smug "you know what you did" answer about 3rd party programs. In blizzards case they change the rules at will, linking accounts, cd keys, ips, whatever they feel like to lazily combat bots. Large media platforms have illdefined rulesets, and exploit them to take people down for even a sniff of controversy with a large following. I'm waiting for someone to point out that if they had 12 folowers they wouldnt be banned, this is pure oppression of those with actual platforms. To me that's a subtle but important point to combat twitter/youtube/facebook's lazy answer of "you broke the rules", as they're not even near the point that they can uniformly enforce them. even in a game like football, where u have a handful of guys watching 22 guys, you have a league office that evaluates plays retroactively to apply fines and suspensions that were missed. media monoliths are working case by case and skimming the cream off the top of the tank.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11011121314124Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll