Quote (Surfpunk @ Dec 1 2017 04:45pm)
Neither do you.
That's the thing though with the deal with Flynn. With the actual evidence they had on Flynn for a number of more serious charges (influence peddling, FARA violations, the plan to kidnap Fethullah Gulen and return him to Turkey, for example), Mueller pretty much had him dead-to-rights. If it was Flynn and just Flynn, Mueller would have no reason to even entertain the thought of a deal with Flynn. The ONLY reason a deal is considered (and this was a sweetheart deal, based on the other stuff Mueller could hit Flynn with), is if Mueller believes the deal will get him a bigger fish. And when you're talking about someone at the level of Flynn (NatSec Advisor), the only "bigger" fish are POTUS and VPOTUS. You have comparable fish, like Kushner, Sessions, but no one else would be bigger, from a prosecutorial standpoint.
Take it from three vantage points
Say there is some massive collusion conspiracy hidden:
Then Mueller has reason to leverage Flynn to try to get him to squeal about it on Trump
Say Mueller is just searching for the truth of collusion at all costs:
Then Mueller has reason to leverage Flynn as a window into the Trump machine and all its inner workings just so he can honestly search for clues of whether collusion occurred or not, which could be demonstrated by how Russia interacted during the transition
Say Mueller is actually a democratic partisan who knows there is no collusion:
Then by exposing every embarrassing link to Russia undertaken diplomatically and potentially exposing Trump in a lie and maybe being able to bring spurious charges on the Logan Act, the transition period would be a gold mine to exploit.