What does that mean? Should a person should only be denied due process if it relates to terrorst or ISIS activities?

Personally I don't think anyone should be barred from buying a gun or running for president if they are being investigated by the FBI. The investigation could be total bogus and I think that sort of rationale opens up the door for a lot of constitutinal issues.

It's why I don't support Obama's proposal to ban gun purchases from people put on no-fly lists. The idea someone could be punished and have rights infringed with no evidence of wrongdoing or no criminal conviction is a very disturbing and tyrannical one to me.

But if HRC truly believes what she said, that someone should have less freedoms based on their investigation status with the FBI, then why should she be able to run for president?

Good point. Let's lift the ban on blind people driving. It's an unfair infringement of their rights.

clinton foreign policy

I don't think gun grabbing while suggesting the presumption of guilt while under investigation is smart for a person under investigation

I didn't watch the speech you're talking about so if she didn't be specific about terrorism investigation that was dumb too

This post was edited by Beowulf on Jun 13 2016 09:56pm

clinton foreign policy == kill yourself

Yes, I gathered that's what you were saying, I just have no idea what you actually mean?

helping israel
edit lets correct this:

"helping" israel

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Jun 13 2016 10:13pm

Your actually getting less coherent.

Trump is pro isreal..

Fuckin noobs i swear