d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Abortion. A Complicated Philosophical Issue.
Prev1101112131419Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Oct 3 2014 07:09pm
Quote (HighschoolTurd @ 4 Oct 2014 00:33)
Technically they are, especially from a naturalistic worldview. We were are all bacteria, but the difference is what that bacteria is destined to evolve into.. That's my point concerning Thor's argument where he thinks there is no indifference between the two.


No no no no no.

Read a fucking book please, for the love of god!
Member
Posts: 1,701
Joined: Mar 16 2009
Gold: 0.00
Oct 3 2014 07:11pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Oct 3 2014 08:05pm)
Sleep paralysis is a conscious, often intensely conscious, experience.

I'm not saying there aren't occasions during sleep that are experiential. I actually practice lucid dreaming as a hobby and have ~5 or so memorable dreams every night.

What I'm referring to are the periods of time during sleep where there is no conscious experience, the period between the dreams.


Thank you.

Tbh I can't say much about consciousness really since its beyond me. When I had sleep paralysis occur, I initally was confused as to why I was aware all of a sudden when I was technically supposed to be asleep due to atony.
Member
Posts: 4,783
Joined: Jul 6 2012
Gold: 68.99
Warn: 10%
Oct 3 2014 07:21pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Oct 4 2014 04:05am)
What I'm referring to are the periods of time during sleep where there is no conscious experience, the period between the dreams.

i think that there's a bit of a problem with referring to consciousness explicitly as something that's remembered / understood / reflected upon afterwards. the fact that i'm conscious while drunk doesn't mean that my memory functions well enough to imprint these experiences into short/long term memories (ergo drunken people repeating themselves & black outs).
or various psychedelics which can shatter one's perception of oneself into the passive reception of sensations and not being able to tell one's sensations apart from one's surroundings, which nevertheless are conscious experiences even without having the localisation to the "self."

This post was edited by Gastly on Oct 3 2014 07:21pm
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Oct 3 2014 07:30pm
Quote (Gastly @ Oct 3 2014 09:21pm)
i think that there's a bit of a problem with referring to consciousness explicitly as something that's remembered / understood / reflected upon afterwards. the fact that i'm conscious while drunk doesn't mean that my memory functions well enough to imprint these experiences into short/long term memories (ergo drunken people repeating themselves & black outs).
or various psychedelics which can shatter one's perception of oneself into the passive reception of sensations and not being able to tell one's sensations apart from one's surroundings, which nevertheless are conscious experiences even without having the localisation to the "self."


I agree, I'm explicitly not referring to consciousness as something that's remembered afterwards. I'm postulating that there are periods during sleep in which there is actually no experience at all.

Psychedelic experiences in general tend to be highly, intensely experiential, the polar opposite of unconsciousness (even if "selfhood" doesn't factor into that experience)... though I could talk for hours about the concept of self, especially in regards to psychedelia.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Oct 3 2014 07:30pm
Member
Posts: 4,783
Joined: Jul 6 2012
Gold: 68.99
Warn: 10%
Oct 3 2014 08:19pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Oct 4 2014 04:30am)
I agree, I'm explicitly not referring to consciousness as something that's remembered afterwards. I'm postulating that there are periods during sleep in which there is actually no experience at all.

Psychedelic experiences in general tend to be highly, intensely experiential, the polar opposite of unconsciousness (even if "selfhood" doesn't factor into that experience)... though I could talk for hours about the concept of self, especially in regards to psychedelia.

such affects not being tied to one's selfhood really bring an interesting point of view to the rights of animals, as the need for a "self" is often touted as a criterion for decent treatment. Nietzschean (and Freudian/Deleuzian/etc.) affects do a pretty fine job at describing human experience as a "formation" of said affects by the way, definitely worth checking out along with phenomonological investigations.
on topic: human rights belong to all humans.

This post was edited by Gastly on Oct 3 2014 08:19pm
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Oct 3 2014 08:30pm
Quote (Gastly @ Oct 3 2014 10:19pm)
such affects not being tied to one's selfhood really bring an interesting point of view to the rights of animals, as the need for a "self" is often touted as a criterion for decent treatment. Nietzschean (and Freudian/Deleuzian/etc.) affects do a pretty fine job at describing human experience as a "formation" of said affects by the way, definitely worth checking out along with phenomonological investigations.
on topic: human rights belong to all humans.


I agree with the idea that "selfhood" (i.e. phenomenal unitary binding) is a criterion for one being morally treated as an end in oneself.

This phenomenal binding, though, is present in all mammals, and is almost certainly present in almost any animal with a brain and a nervous system.

I wish you'd post here more, you consistently make excellent posts.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Oct 3 2014 08:46pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 3 2014 09:22pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Oct 3 2014 07:05pm)
Sleep paralysis is a conscious, often intensely conscious, experience.

I'm not saying there aren't occasions during sleep that are experiential. I actually practice lucid dreaming as a hobby and have ~5 or so memorable dreams every night.

What I'm referring to are the periods of time during sleep where there is no conscious experience, the period between the dreams.


Just because your brain isn't recording the experience doesn't mean it isn't happening. I rarely remember my dreams, but I know I dream because of what my wife tells me the next morning.
Member
Posts: 60,934
Joined: Jan 24 2007
Gold: 351.00
Oct 4 2014 10:50am
Quote (FrozenWater @ Oct 3 2014 03:25am)
Brace yourselves for the wall of text that follows:
(Im posting it all in one text because i dont have the time to follow through the thread and reply piece by piece. But I do challenge people to argue against these points im making, you may even change my beliefs - though, I doubt it)


Abortions are (most safely) done in the first trimester. In fact, over half of all abortions are obtained within the first 8 weeks.
Fewer than 2% occur at 21 weeks or later. The vast majority of women - 88% - who have an abortion do so in their first trimester. Medical abortions also have less than 0.05% risk of a complication that requires hospital stay, and do not affect a woman's health of future ability to become pregnant or give birth.
A fetus cannot exist independently of the mother during the first trimester. As it is attached by the placenta and umbilical cord, its health is dependent on her health, and cannot be regarded as a separate entity as it cannot exist outside her womb.


When we talk about criminalizing abortion, we are talking about the government forcing a woman to give birth against her will.
The ability of a woman to have control of her body is critical to civil rights. Take away her reproductive choice and you step onto a slippery slope. If the government can force women to continue a pregnancy, what about forcing a woman to use contraception or undergo sterilization?


"If they become tired or even die, that does not matter. Let them die in childbirth - that is why they are there." - Martin Luther
Freedom of religion is guaranteed to any citizen in Australia; so why would the beliefs and values of one religion mandate actual laws for all citizens? It would be unfair, unjust and immoral.


What about abortion in the case of rape or incest? Forcing a woman made pregnant by this violent act would cause further psychological harm to the victim.
Often a woman is too afraid to speak up, or is unaware that she is pregnant, thus the morning after pill is ineffective in these situations. Abortion is the only reasonable answer.


Teenage pregnancies and stress? Teenagers who become mothers have grim prospects for the future. They are much more likely to leave school; receive inadequate prenatal care; rely on public assistance to raise a child; develop health problems; or end up divorced.
Like any other difficult situation, abortion creates stress.. Yet the American Psychological Association found that stress was greatest prior to an abortion, and that there was no evidence of post-abortion syndrome.


Now, i'll address the standard form argument claiming abortion is 'murder'
- It is wrong to kill innocent human beings
- The embryo is an innocent human being.
- Hence it is wrong to kill the embryo.

'Human being' is used in different senses in (1) and (2). In (1), 'human being' is used in a moral sense to mean a 'person', a 'full-fledged member of the moral community'.
In (2), the 'human being' means 'biological human'. It does not follow that the embryo is a person, and it is persons that have rights, such as the right to life.


Lastly, what defines a 'human being'..
The great Carl Sagan said:
"If you deliberately kill a human being, it's called murder. If you deliberately kill a chimpanzee -- biologically, our closest relative, sharing 99.6 percent of our active genes -- whatever else it is, it's not murder. To date, murder uniquely applies to killing human beings. Therefore, the question of when personhood arises is key to the abortion debate. When does the foetus become human?"
- So, if only a person can be murdered, when does the fetus attain personhood?
-When its face becomes distincly human, near the end of the first trimester?
-When the fetus becomes responsive to stimuli - again, at the end of the first trimester?
-When the lungs have reached a stage of development sufficient that the fetus might, just conceivably, be able to breathe on its own in the outside air?

None of these particular developmental milestones involve uniquely human characteristics -- apart from the superficial matter of facial appearance. All animals respond to stimuli and a large number are able to breathe. But that doesn't stop us from slaughtering them by the billions. Our one great advantage, the secret of our success, is thought.
By placing harmless electrodes on a subject's head, scientists can measure the electrical activity produced by the network of neurons inside the skill. Different kinds of mental activity show different kinds of brain waves. But brain waves with regular patterns typical of adult human brains do not appear in the foetus until about the thirtieth week of pregnancy - near the beginning of the third trimester.


Conclusion - no person has any inherent or implied, legal or moral right to occupy another.


Heroic brw
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Oct 4 2014 10:57am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 3 2014 10:22pm)
Just because your brain isn't recording the experience doesn't mean it isn't happening.  I rarely remember my dreams, but I know I dream because of what my wife tells me the next morning.


The brain isn't just recording the experiment like a passive receiver, it is creating the experience as well. Senses are meaningless jumbo without the massive contruction effort by the brain itself. Cognitive science backs up that the brain is more active in creating reality than it is passively transcribing it.

It isn't like we ever experience the objective world, only our representational and transcended reality. We experience phenomena not noumena.
Member
Posts: 9,060
Joined: May 15 2010
Gold: 18,470.03
Oct 4 2014 11:02am
Quote (bitg_pj @ Oct 4 2014 11:50am)
Heroic brw


It's a moronic post. Assignment of developmental milestones to define personhood is subjective. There is nothing to stop me from saying that personhood is not achieved until the brain is fully developed somewhere around age 24. Just another milestone in the development of a preexisting separate entity. The objective defining moment of conception is the biological truth.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1101112131419Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll