Quote (Santara @ Dec 21 2009 01:11pm)
You once again miss my point. A: No one should have their marriage recognized by the state. B: Everyone should have their union recognized by the state. Ergo, everyone gets their entitled rights, so then, if no one is denied their rights, the comparison is a straw man. I do not consider marriage a liberty, because in this context, the word liberty is interchangeable with right. I consider marriage a privilege. Also, as I said earlier, if gays want to be married, they can still find a church to do it for them, and government could have NO SAY in whether a church chooses to recognize such a marriage or not. In other words, in this scenario, the state CAN'T get involved because of the separation doctrine.
Your wrong, I got your point. I agree with you 100%.