Quote (cambovenzi @ May 31 2024 01:24am)
The propaganda you posted said collusion was proven because oh no Roger Stone dared to talk to Julian Assange and wikileaks exposed democrat crimes and wrongdoing. Good for them.
Meanwhile even MSM source after source says no direct evidence of conspiracy was found.
"After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee." -Nbc
The blm/antifa thing is a total joke on your part. Mass destruction compared to some guys who got into fights with antifa thugs. But you like one and buy into the propaganda so you think its not as bad.
Just not a serious line of thinking at all. I dont need to bother to post stats about how much damage was done. Everyone who isn't defective and brainwashed knows you are wrong on that. Deep down even you do.
See, you just choose to not read everything. That same document states that multiple Trump administration were in contact with Russia, and that Russia was actively interfering in the election, and you can guess for who. Take a guess, maybe Trump? Ding ding ding. So, you cling on to that little sentence that Trump wasn't directly tied to working with Russia, even though a lot of his administration was... but no no, no collusion at all

As for the blm/antifa stuff, if rioters did get involved (and it was found out that a lot of riots were started by right wing extremists), then I do believe they should be prosecuted, so nice try there. Also, if you're not antifa then you're a fascist, so which are you?
Again, proud boys are terrorists, and I didn't see any blm trying to overthrow the govt on Jan 6th.
So yea, don't post any stats or sources, cause you know you'll lose that debate.
This post was edited by Pyrotechx on May 31 2024 12:42am