d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Trump's Legal Cases
Prev110111213Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 27,144
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Aug 22 2023 02:40pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 22 Aug 2023 16:38)
Just curious: in your opinion, does the bolded also apply to the Supreme Court?^^^^^^


It isn't supposed to

but we all know how the world works. What the rules are and what actually happens doesnt always jive. Sometimes you rolling stop at a stop sign, sometimes you j walk to get across the street faster, sometimes you assign a scj with staunchly aligned political views.. There is gray to every rule

haha
Member
Posts: 54,099
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Aug 22 2023 02:42pm
Quote (Crunkt @ 22 Aug 2023 22:40)
It isn't supposed to

but we all know how the world works. What the rules are and what actually happens doesnt always jive. Sometimes you rolling stop at a stop sign, sometimes you j walk to get across the street faster, sometimes you assign a scj with staunchly aligned political views.. There is gray to every rule

haha

So you admit that SCOTUS judges have partisan viewpoints, and that their political views inform their rulings - why shouldn't the same also apply to the lower courts, or the career officials in the DoJ?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Aug 22 2023 02:42pm
Member
Posts: 27,144
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Aug 22 2023 02:46pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 22 Aug 2023 16:42)
So you admit that SCOTUS judges have partisan viewpoints, and that their political views inform their rulings - why shouldn't the same also apply to the lower courts, or the career officials in the DoJ?


every single event that happens ever has a bias as to why it happened.

Every single human is politically aligned. It IS NOT SUPPOSED to interfere with their job. but the SCJ is so corrupt that we plebs commonly point to the presidents that aissigned them and their political alignment to say that they will favour those partisan issues one way or another.

What we have seen since the swing to a 6-3 Republican President appointed scjs is that Republicans keep over and over again losing with cases that come to the sc. Republicans are getting owned, and its a 6-3 sc. Why?? Because judges arent supposed to be partisan in their decisions. There is the law.

Every single person has bias and every single person has a poltiical alignment. It is a moot point when referring to professionals that have career positions in non politically appointed positions.

If you truly have to go down the road of 'well i think this person is corrupt so fuck you you are wong no matter what you say' well I remember when I was fucking 4 years old. Again, show me evidence of such corruption like uncommon practice or changes being made in stark contrast to the median, then ya that might warrant taking a look at.

Like how Trump is getting all his cases pushed out more than like 6 months when they should happen within 70 days. Thats special treatment right there, for example. your turn

This post was edited by Crunkt on Aug 22 2023 02:47pm
Member
Posts: 19,234
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Aug 22 2023 03:06pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 22 2023 01:42pm)
So you admit that SCOTUS judges have partisan viewpoints, and that their political views inform their rulings - why shouldn't the same also apply to the lower courts, or the career officials in the DoJ?


why did the Trump administration work so hard to politicize the lower courts, the SCOTUS, the DOJ and all other arms of government you're complaining about? he installed partisan puppets at the lowest and the highest levels
you cant complain about a witch hunt or politicization when thats exactly what the other party is guilty of doing, doesnt work like that. thats like punching someone in the face and then crying because you got punched in the face back
Member
Posts: 19,234
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Aug 22 2023 04:14pm
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/22/trump-witness-reversal-testimony-jack-smith-00112355

Quote
A Trump employee who monitored security cameras at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate abruptly retracted his earlier grand jury testimony and implicated Trump and others in obstruction of justice just after switching from an attorney paid for by a Trump political action committee to a lawyer from the federal defender’s office in Washington, prosecutors said in a court filing Tuesday.

The security aide – described as “Trump Employee 4” in public court filings but identified elsewhere as Yuscil Taveras – initially testified to a grand jury in Washington, D.C. that he was unaware of any effort to erase the videos, but after getting the new attorney “immediately … retracted his prior false testimony” and detailed the alleged effort to tamper with evidence related to the investigation of the handling of classified information stored at Trump’s Florida home, the new submission said.
Member
Posts: 15,802
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
Aug 22 2023 04:52pm
Quote (gnarjay @ Aug 22 2023 04:14pm)


Looks like the doj put the knee to neck and forced a fake testimony. Floyd doesn’t approve.
Member
Posts: 19,234
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Aug 22 2023 05:01pm
Quote (Landmine @ Aug 22 2023 03:52pm)
Looks like the doj put the knee to neck and forced a fake testimony. Floyd doesn’t approve.


you mean Trumps lawyers were forcing the witness to lie and he changed his mind once he was out from under the Trump umbrella?
Member
Posts: 19,234
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Aug 22 2023 05:28pm
LOL. everyone in his circle is a big ol pussy

Member
Posts: 15,802
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
Aug 22 2023 07:22pm
Quote (gnarjay @ Aug 22 2023 05:01pm)
you mean Trumps lawyers were forcing the witness to lie and he changed his mind once he was out from under the Trump umbrella?


Not likely at all.
Member
Posts: 27,144
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Aug 22 2023 07:36pm


This post was edited by Crunkt on Aug 22 2023 07:36pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev110111213Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll