Quote (IceMage @ 17 Jan 2017 19:49)
Have you seen the 2 page report presented to Trump/Obama/Biden? How do you know it was just a summary of the 35 page buzzfeed nonsense? The ex-MI6 agent with Russian sources wasn't the originator of the buzzfeed report. CNN's sources said it was personal and financial in nature, I'm not sure getting golden showers in Russia qualifies as financial. The media never reported that the buzzfeed thing was true, or that it was credible, so maybe try getting your news from reputable sources so we can debate the facts.
[...]
Can you tell me which part of CNN's reporting on the 2 page "blackmail" material was not factual?
if none of the media knew if the buzzfeed story was true or even a tad bit credible, why did they go ahead and report on it anyway? in fact, rumors about this whole trump-in-russia-story haven been circulating around for weeks. none of the "quality press" reported on it, apparently for good reason. then CNN went ahead and published their report on it, thus giving this ridiculous story credibility and public attention.
Quote
Go re-read the last page, you clearly didn't understand why Clinton's popular vote lead was relevant to the discussion I was having.
you said "Actually that +12 polling isn't bad." that is obviously not true, since her final national vote tally is +3, not +12. quite the difference.
serious forecasts actually had assigned an unusually high probability on a popular vote - electoral college split for weeks going into election day. clinton winning the popular vote was pretty much given. however, serious forecasts (fivethirtyeight, that one researcher from microsoft, trumps own campaign analysts) had trump at about a 30-35% chance to win the electoral college, while bad forecasts like the one in the nytimes had his chances at 2%.
Quote
So now the standard for a news outlet to be credible is that they sometimes tell the truth? While most of the time they peddle conspiracies and partisan hackery?
EVERY news outlet should be considered with a grain of salt. yes, if you read a story on a low-quality website like breitbart or buzzfeed, you should be particularly wary. my point, however, is that one should also be reasonably sceptic and wary when dealing with news from supposedly quality press like CNN.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 17 2017 02:58pm