d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1109510961097109810993169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Jan 17 2017 12:49pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 17 2017 01:33pm)
pizzagate was fake news. reports about trump paying russian hookers to golden shower a hotel bedroom in which obama had (allegedly) stayed some months before is just as wild a story as pizzagate. if mainstreammedia wasnt so biased against trump that they are willing to believe any absurd news that is bad for him, nobody would give this story any credit.

likewise, both campaigns knew about the voting system in place, which is the electoral college. therefore, both campaigns tried to maximize their electoral vote, not the popular vote. hence, no one knows what would have happened if both candidates had fought for the popular vote; for example if trump had campaigned in california and new york and dallas and so on. therefore, the 3 million more popular votes for clinton dont mean jackshit. they are irrelevant.

but maybe those two points are a little too nunced for you to understand.





well, when it comes to representing and enforcing their respective countries' interestes abroad, putin is without a doubt better than obama. (I dont know enough about russian domestic policy to compare it to obamas...)

besides that.... sometimes breitbart and inforwars do tell the truth - often times in situations where the truth doesnt fit the liberal narrative. conversely, CNN and the other mainstream media mostly dont tell blatant lies, but often enough hold back important info so that the report gets skewed and biased in the desired direction. yes, CNN is, overall, more serious and trustworthy than breitbart. but not everything CNN tells you is the truth, and not everything breitbart reports on is fake news. I'd even dare to say that breitbart and CNN/the MSM are about equal when it comes to blowing minor incidents out of proportion.


Have you seen the 2 page report presented to Trump/Obama/Biden? How do you know it was just a summary of the 35 page buzzfeed nonsense? The ex-MI6 agent with Russian sources wasn't the originator of the buzzfeed report. CNN's sources said it was personal and financial in nature, I'm not sure getting golden showers in Russia qualifies as financial. The media never reported that the buzzfeed thing was true, or that it was credible, so maybe try getting your news from reputable sources so we can debate the facts.

Go re-read the last page, you clearly didn't understand why Clinton's popular vote lead was relevant to the discussion I was having.

According to some polls Putin has a higher favorability rating among Republicans than Obama does. Apparently partisanship matters more than patriotism.

So now the standard for a news outlet to be credible is that they sometimes tell the truth? While most of the time they peddle conspiracies and partisan hackery?

Can you tell me which part of CNN's reporting on the 2 page "blackmail" material was not factual?
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 17 2017 01:20pm
Quote (IceMage @ Jan 17 2017 02:49pm)
Have you seen the 2 page report presented to Trump/Obama/Biden? How do you know it was just a summary of the 35 page buzzfeed nonsense? The ex-MI6 agent with Russian sources wasn't the originator of the buzzfeed report. CNN's sources said it was personal and financial in nature, I'm not sure getting golden showers in Russia qualifies as financial. The media never reported that the buzzfeed thing was true, or that it was credible, so maybe try getting your news from reputable sources so we can debate the facts.

Go re-read the last page, you clearly didn't understand why Clinton's popular vote lead was relevant to the discussion I was having.

According to some polls Putin has a higher favorability rating among Republicans than Obama does. Apparently partisanship matters more than patriotism.

So now the standard for a news outlet to be credible is that they sometimes tell the truth? While most of the time they peddle conspiracies and partisan hackery?

Can you tell me which part of CNN's reporting on the 2 page "blackmail" material was not factual?


I wish you were half this skeptical of everything the left was involved with.
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Jan 17 2017 01:24pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Jan 17 2017 07:20pm)
I wish you were half this skeptical of everything the left was involved with.


Considering his posts in the past he is.

Member
Posts: 54,207
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 17 2017 02:57pm
Quote (IceMage @ 17 Jan 2017 19:49)
Have you seen the 2 page report presented to Trump/Obama/Biden? How do you know it was just a summary of the 35 page buzzfeed nonsense? The ex-MI6 agent with Russian sources wasn't the originator of the buzzfeed report. CNN's sources said it was personal and financial in nature, I'm not sure getting golden showers in Russia qualifies as financial. The media never reported that the buzzfeed thing was true, or that it was credible, so maybe try getting your news from reputable sources so we can debate the facts.

[...]

Can you tell me which part of CNN's reporting on the 2 page "blackmail" material was not factual?


if none of the media knew if the buzzfeed story was true or even a tad bit credible, why did they go ahead and report on it anyway? in fact, rumors about this whole trump-in-russia-story haven been circulating around for weeks. none of the "quality press" reported on it, apparently for good reason. then CNN went ahead and published their report on it, thus giving this ridiculous story credibility and public attention.



Quote
Go re-read the last page, you clearly didn't understand why Clinton's popular vote lead was relevant to the discussion I was having.


you said "Actually that +12 polling isn't bad." that is obviously not true, since her final national vote tally is +3, not +12. quite the difference.

serious forecasts actually had assigned an unusually high probability on a popular vote - electoral college split for weeks going into election day. clinton winning the popular vote was pretty much given. however, serious forecasts (fivethirtyeight, that one researcher from microsoft, trumps own campaign analysts) had trump at about a 30-35% chance to win the electoral college, while bad forecasts like the one in the nytimes had his chances at 2%.


Quote
So now the standard for a news outlet to be credible is that they sometimes tell the truth? While most of the time they peddle conspiracies and partisan hackery?


EVERY news outlet should be considered with a grain of salt. yes, if you read a story on a low-quality website like breitbart or buzzfeed, you should be particularly wary. my point, however, is that one should also be reasonably sceptic and wary when dealing with news from supposedly quality press like CNN.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 17 2017 02:58pm
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 17 2017 09:07pm
Lame duck reported quacking all over Washington.



This post was edited by EndlessSky on Jan 17 2017 09:08pm
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Jan 17 2017 09:10pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 17 Jan 2017 19:07)



Someone makes a reasonable argument, you reply with a cartoon someone else made

This is actually smarter than your usual attempt
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Jan 17 2017 09:10pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Jan 17 2017 10:10pm)
Someone makes a reasonable argument, you reply with a cartoon someone else made

This is actually smarter than your usual attempt


I think he's become the worst poster on the entire forum.
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Jan 17 2017 09:16pm
Quote (Voyaging @ 17 Jan 2017 19:10)
I think he's become the worst poster on the entire forum.



Pretty tough to decide between him and excellence tbh, different degrees of the same willful self-delusion.
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Jan 17 2017 09:16pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Jan 17 2017 10:16pm)
Pretty tough to decide between him and excellence tbh, different degrees of the same willful self-delusion.


excellence just likes to troll.
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 17 2017 09:19pm
The left doesn't have arguments anymore. Its just reactionary snark.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1109510961097109810993169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll