Qft

No, it's just being candid and honest. Obama's right, he would've won a third term against Trump, and it likely would've been an electoral landslide.

On election day I don't think any reasonable person thought Clinton would win GA, TX, or KS. My electoral map didn't have any of those states in it. AZ was closer. Again, you'll dodge all day but the Trump campaign didn't think they were going to win election night. Their internal polling had it closer than many of the public polls, but they got it wrong as well.

Now, a stupid person like yourself will take that to mean all polling is inaccurate(unless of course it shows Trump winning states in the primary, winning states in the general, or any information that benefits your cult leader). You missed my point on the popular vote... Clinton was up big nationally and she won big nationally. That's why national polls are sort of irrelevant.

Voters didn't reject Obama's legacy, they rejected a seriously flawed, status quo candidate. Obama's approval rating(oh no more polls!) is very high which is why part of Trump's strategy was to not focus on Obama specifically in the general election.

uh, wrong
Trump was running against (C)linton [who had Obama carrying her water saying this is personal, my legacy is on the ballot, don't boo vote - i'll pull up an article for you if need because you were probably drooling after your 3rd SSRI cocktail of that day and missed it] and he said if you want more of the same (Obama) vote for her. 304-227, oops

>calls others stupid
>has convinced himself that voting for a pro-abortion candidate is 'the christian thing to do"



e: here's some articles from noted reich-wing websites:
http://www.nbcnews.com/card/obama-my-legacy-ballot-n656066
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/a-final-push-on-decision-day-obama-is-not-on-the-ballot-but-his-legacy-is/2016/11/08/e70d18c6-a206-11e6-8d63-3e0a660f1f04_story.html?utm_term=.907ff3e951ca
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/10/12/1581510/-Obama-ties-his-legacy-to-Hillary-Clinton-s-candidacy-in-powerful-new-video
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/obama-congressional-black-caucus-228327

This post was edited by excellence on Jan 17 2017 10:44am

I like how he argues with civil rights icons over hurt feelings on Twitter on MLK day.

What a loser!

yeah the Civil Rights icon who said Bernie Sanders didn't do shit for the Civil Rights movement
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2016/02/john-lewis-bernie-sanders-civil-rights
Civil Rights Hero John Lewis Slams Bernie Sanders
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/john-lewis-on-sanders-civil-rights-work-never-saw-him/
John Lewis on Sanders’ civil rights work: ‘Never saw him’

and then decided to back the racist, 'superpredator' crime bill totting failure of a (c)andiate (C)linton. the one who worked with Barry Goldwater's campaign in 1964
typical hypocritical modern-era racist liberal democrat tactics.

enjoy all those 'madame president' posters and stickers you're taking a huge loss on

This post was edited by excellence on Jan 17 2017 10:55am

Yeah, Obama did all he could to try to convince the Obama coalition to get out and vote. Obama tying his legacy to Hillary's candidacy was a strategic move to get his voters out to the polls. They didn't. They weren't inspired by Hillary, and Obama wasn't on the ballot. Poll(not fake news) after poll(not fake news) showed that America wanted a change candidate, and Hillary wasn't it. Plain and simple.

I've never taken SSRI's so either you have me mistaken for someone else or are a weak troll. Maybe both?



Sad!

This post was edited by IceMage on Jan 17 2017 10:59am

Truthland ended when the welfare state began.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Jan 17 2017 11:02am

....

Reported for spam.

pizzagate was fake news. reports about trump paying russian hookers to golden shower a hotel bedroom in which obama had (allegedly) stayed some months before is just as wild a story as pizzagate. if mainstreammedia wasnt so biased against trump that they are willing to believe any absurd news that is bad for him, nobody would give this story any credit.

likewise, both campaigns knew about the voting system in place, which is the electoral college. therefore, both campaigns tried to maximize their electoral vote, not the popular vote. hence, no one knows what would have happened if both candidates had fought for the popular vote; for example if trump had campaigned in california and new york and dallas and so on. therefore, the 3 million more popular votes for clinton dont mean jackshit. they are irrelevant.

but maybe those two points are a little too nunced for you to understand.





well, when it comes to representing and enforcing their respective countries' interestes abroad, putin is without a doubt better than obama. (I dont know enough about russian domestic policy to compare it to obamas...)

besides that.... sometimes breitbart and inforwars do tell the truth - often times in situations where the truth doesnt fit the liberal narrative. conversely, CNN and the other mainstream media mostly dont tell blatant lies, but often enough hold back important info so that the report gets skewed and biased in the desired direction. yes, CNN is, overall, more serious and trustworthy than breitbart. but not everything CNN tells you is the truth, and not everything breitbart reports on is fake news. I'd even dare to say that breitbart and CNN/the MSM are about equal when it comes to blowing minor incidents out of proportion.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 17 2017 12:34pm