Quote (addone @ May 10 2023 09:30pm)
What irony? What proof? What discord/reddit buddies are you talking about?
Christianity is a game of Chinese wispers/Arabic telephone where the original message gets passed around without anyone proving the original claim. Someone made God up just like they made up Santa Claus story and you are just parroting what the the previous guy told you based on what the guy before him told the other guy and so on.
Faith based belief means you don't require any proof you are just a parrot. Science has foundation on which the claims are made, it has proof and an explanation which can be tested, observed, logical and repeatable for anyone. You don't need to take someone's word for it. There is no magic involved, its not based on superstition but facts. Science is an evolving theory that gets updated when more and better facts are presented. There is always a possibility of it being incorrect it is never perfect. Where as religion is set in stone, rigid and claims to be perfect.
You are claiming airy fairy nonsense but I don't see you put a (in theory/imho/maybe/allegedly) at the end of your rants it's always as a statement of "this is 100% true" this is real and science is wrong you have downs projections. If you don't have proof bud then you are welcome to leave and post copium comments in your Christian sub where mods shelter fragile people from being exposed anything that contradicts their delusional larping experience.
hahaha atheist monkey to man science. early evidence piltdown man 30 fraud. haeckel's embryo drawings 100 yeas in text book fraud
hhahaha when one fraud is exposed its replaced with another fraud
Quote (addone @ May 10 2023 09:44pm)
Weeks/Months later you still having difficulty grasping for "comedic effect". Keep assuming that the meme was to be interpreted literally and not metaphorically. You are always pulling an excuse of "it's metaphor" when you get proven wrong. Surely by now you would know what that is. Well jesus with a gun is also a metaphor just like any political cartoon that was ever created. Only you seem to take a meme literally.
Are you new to the internet or you just that slow?
Also keep intentionally assuming that evolution means that one day we come out of an ape with no steps in between. Cmon show us more ignorance we need a good laugh.
i give it the attention it deserves.................its dumb but ya good for a laugh
Quote (Modulok2405 @ May 10 2023 10:18pm)
There is no "idea of monkey to man" Thats just a theistic narrative born out of an inability to understand simple concepts.
You know the problems I have with quotes, Videos and stuff like that is that its mostly just adopted and cherrypicked opinions rather than YOU yourself thinking about stuff.
Take for example this man you quote those last couple of posts, Richard Lewontin. Thats a highly subjective opinion and has nothing to do with honesty. He sees as a "problem" with science were there is none.
Of course science operates inside of the material, physical world because where else should it?
Science is about recreational, verifiable methods to come to conclusions and solutions. Of course there is no room for god, because god is not measurable or calculable - Doesnt necessarily mean science is trying to disprove god. It just has nothing to do with it. As I said, there is just an overlapping and thats why theists often think science is the opposite of religion - which it is not.
Your second quote about Dawkins is a REAL example of honesty. You said atheists cant be honest? Well, there you have it. He is hknest and admits he doesnt know. Thats science in a nutshell by the way. Science doesnt claim to know, science just tries to find out.
You know why we use animals as metaphors, right? What do you think WHY the dictionary has the explanation "a treacherous or deceitful person" in it? Could you think of a reason?
Could that reason maybe be the bible? Answer: Yes it could.
No the bible does not mean the snake was a person. People can be called snakes today BECAUSE the snake in the bible was deceitful. Its pretty damn logical.
Simulation Hypothesis is not a bitch for me at all, its a very interesting idea and I love it. I always love good and thought out Science Fiction.
having a fit because you dont like the expression "monkey to man" isnt very scientific.
i use quotes from people that have more credentials than you its not posted for you to "like" go a head call them false o mighty cock sure gate keeper of knowledge
"science" is done by people. some how they are magically infallible?
i dont see science as opposite to scripture and neither do alot of christians.
correction i said "
antitheists cant be honest"
and nope again lets look at it again. hes cock sure God isnt a goog explanation.
All I know is that God isn't a good explanation wow he actually
KNOWS that. wow what a dude.
can almost hear him crying "...so we must wait and hope that somebody comes up with a better one."
high priest of antitheism
I have no explanation for complex biological design.
All I know is that God isn't a good explanation, so we must wait and hope that somebody comes up with a better one.
Richard Dawkins
ya snake wasnt a person cause you cock sure say so
ya to bad. some people think simulation hypothesis is more than sci fi. you go and declare them false.
Quote (addone @ May 10 2023 11:26pm)
No it's not same lol. WHEN I claim something it is my opinion and or a scientific theory as a default. I have no problem saying I could be incorrect. My statements are based on facts and theories which I am prepared to back up. But the logic follows if Christians make the claim of gods existence they need to provide evidence/proof which can be examined and discussed/peer reviewed in order to extablish facts. I didn't birth the idea of a God and if you don't have evidence then I am under no obligation to disprove it. That is why I can say God doesn't exist it's because onus is on you the original promulagor of the idea. I also say God doesn't exist I don't have 100% certainty it's my opinion maybe there is I am not ignorant of the possibility. But there is no evidence after doing my research and looking at other intelligent minds who arrived at same conclusion.
Likewise IF I made a claim that Santa or Peter Pan was real I wouldn't expect you to disprove it. If however I presented material evidence, well formulated logic and a way to verify my claim THEN I would expect you to test out and peer review my statement.
Again you are just making claims without saying how they are "cringe". There needs to be a because... followed by reasoning. Otherwise it's just a personal attack not a constructive criticism.
like napkin religion?