Quote (TiStuff @ May 10 2023 07:16pm)
that you just might be believing lies?
well atheist and antitheist are not the same.
haeckel's embryo drawings are just part of the accumulated fraud in atheist/antitheist science. lies to propagate the idea of monkey to man. and you dont want to know anything about it.
ok heres the facts. some atheists are actually honest and admit to problems like the Richard Lewontin you want to act like doesnt count.
then antitheists like high priest dawkins have 'cock sure ideas
high priest of antitheism
"I have no explanation for complex biological design. All I know is that God isn't a good explanation, so we must wait and hope that somebody comes up with a better one."
Richard Dawkins
why should i use my own words when i can use the words of notable atheists/antitheists ?
really lazy when you refuse to provide scripture with your argument.
any way here is one
snake
noun
noun: snake; plural noun: snakes; noun: snake in the grass; plural noun: snakes in the grass; noun: the snake; noun: plumber's snake; plural noun: plumber's snakes
2. a treacherous or deceitful person.
BTW straight from science "simulation hypothesis" aint that a bich for u
"And yes of course science is never against common sense." c'mon dude science is done by people.
There is no "idea of monkey to man" Thats just a theistic narrative born out of an inability to understand simple concepts.
You know the problems I have with quotes, Videos and stuff like that is that its mostly just adopted and cherrypicked opinions rather than YOU yourself thinking about stuff.
Take for example this man you quote those last couple of posts, Richard Lewontin. Thats a highly subjective opinion and has nothing to do with honesty. He sees as a "problem" with science were there is none.
Of course science operates inside of the material, physical world because where else should it?
Science is about recreational, verifiable methods to come to conclusions and solutions. Of course there is no room for god, because god is not measurable or calculable - Doesnt necessarily mean science is trying to disprove god. It just has nothing to do with it. As I said, there is just an overlapping and thats why theists often think science is the opposite of religion - which it is not.
Your second quote about Dawkins is a REAL example of honesty. You said atheists cant be honest? Well, there you have it. He is hknest and admits he doesnt know. Thats science in a nutshell by the way. Science doesnt claim to know, science just tries to find out.
You know why we use animals as metaphors, right? What do you think WHY the dictionary has the explanation "a treacherous or deceitful person" in it? Could you think of a reason?
Could that reason maybe be the bible? Answer: Yes it could.
No the bible does not mean the snake was a person. People can be called snakes today BECAUSE the snake in the bible was deceitful. Its pretty damn logical.
Simulation Hypothesis is not a bitch for me at all, its a very interesting idea and I love it. I always love good and thought out Science Fiction.