Quote (thesnipa @ May 1 2019 05:53pm)
i admitted that i wasn't very clear. i try to do that when i can. perhaps you should as well.
like your question could have been "what about his testimony was biased" and we'd have gotten there a step sooner, luckily i can steer a ship through any storm so you're always safe with me old pal. just sit back and enjoy the ride, i can hold up both sides of the conversation.
but also, no that's not what i'm saying exactly. i'm saying the bereft of political party everyone seems to be decided already. whereas on many political issues there's a more varied range of views than we see on Russiagate.
i put in an edit about the summary in prior post.
how would i know how specific to ask though? you're statement was vague and never stated that it was his "testimony". how would i know it's his "testimony" specifically.
and if i should "just know", then shut up cause you should too.
i do not need to be specific when dealing with vague statements.
period
Quote
incoming edit about summary:
not only was it stated on the "summary", and confirmed more than just today..
that 4 page letter from barr was a "summary of the principal conclusions". not a summary of the full report.
anything including mueller is separate topic, but i'll go on that too if you want.
i put the summary crap here now
This post was edited by tagged4nothing on May 1 2019 05:02pm