im not ignoring it. o? he was prosecuted? then wtf are you complaining about?

it was brought up in court. and trumps own lawyers argued against themselves. i believe one of their responses was "there was a non-zero amount" when asked by the judge on how many republican poll watchers there were.

you can clearly see the pattern here, trump's lawyers would not perjure themselves in actual court and they lost.

why are you only indicating that there was voter fraud in favour of biden?


in addition, there is an international watch dog that was invited independently watch for voter fraud and they did not find anything to substantiate trump's claims of systematic wide spread voter fraud - this was because there was none.

the supreme court also dismissed these cases. meaning, they have no merit.

fukn red herring ...........non zero meaning more than zero meaning they didnt know exact count. has nothing to do with fuk all red herring BS

how come all the polls that closed for some reason kicking everyone out is where all the weird stuff happened? how come none of it is viewed in court? how come no one did any thing but play pass the buck. were is the open and honest stuff?

it means they had republican poll watchers in the room.

why do you try to gas light the one person is it really that bad all you have is one person that got prosecuted? doent it sound like BS that you want to put all focus on one one one one one person that got prosecuted?? sounds like desperate bullchit to me.

YA lol who appointed the "independent" ones................thats just tooooooo funny

"the supreme court also dismissed these cases. meaning, they have no merit"
(means they are/were compromised or we could get something open and honest instead of all the hiding like closed for the night polls while all the other polls doing their jobs just fine.)

not when they were closed. they told every one they were closing for the night and be back open in the morning except? pssst we need a pole watcher cause we bullchiting ev1 ooo??? that musta been a "special" poll watcher. none of sound even a lil teeny weenie bit like BS to you does it.. its all sound like its up n up ...............what a load of chit.

He doesn't even do his own research into stories. He saw a 1 min clip with a sensationalist title and he goes along with it. Ask him to elaborate on the full breakdown on the poll watcher story and watch him stammer and say buzzwords because he barely even knows what went on. He probably doesn't even know the city it took place

This post was edited by kenw on Mar 16 2021 02:16pm

Psychosis in action. We broke him folks.