The caste system in its original state is fluid and based on prrsonality. The modern indian interpretation is a twisted version of what was represented before the kurukshetra wars, possibly the after effects of the Kali Yuga during the Dwapara Yuga.

If you want to know more about the culture I suggest reading the Bhagavad Gita.

It's hilarious that sub-mediocre thinkers like you always try so very hard to find some kind of alternate social structure where you can imagine that you deserve to be near the top.

I mean, it's really, definitely not just you that I've seen this sort of thing with, and it's just hilarious every time. There's nothing that a dullard seems to enjoy more than finding a way to delude themselves into thinking they're anything but.

I have actually read that. And the Ramayana. I am stronger in Christian theology. I like Buddhist ethics and other virtue based ethics like Aristotle's a lot more though. Kant has my heart.

When is enough enough?

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-inmate-sex-reassignment-20170106-story.html

thanks obama....

Ramayana is great too! Rama and sita represent the male and female archetypes from Hindu culture.

The thing I like especially about Hinduism is that its a complete worldview. Many views are reactionary and arent complete guides to life.

Ive never read any of Kant unfortunately.

Cry white boy! We'z President Nah!

way to religion assume, bigot

Oh I see - you know more about it than the local scholars do because you might or might not fap to Evola.
He's not a bad scholar though.

Well, the Yavanas affected Buddha's sculpting, and the Saka meant affection upon their history as well. Which of the two are more Indian according to you?

This post was edited by Gastly on Jan 6 2017 10:55pm