d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1105710581059106010615001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Feb 18 2017 08:51pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Feb 18 2017 07:47pm)
populism & 66$ from his own pocket, many people had the illusion he was close to them, that is partially true.
not to mention the taxsheet, is released btw ?


that's between him and his supporters that got him elected

I wasn't and I'm not a supporter so it's not for me to say whether he is one of them or not

It would be nice to have his taxes be transparent but I'm guessing we will only see those if a hacker releases them
Member
Posts: 18,212
Joined: Jul 15 2014
Gold: 107.77
Feb 18 2017 08:55pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Feb 18 2017 09:37pm)
Fixed

Except for the informed part, Putin is a brilliant criminal mastermind.


shhhh comrade, we must keep these silly Americans in the dark

Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Feb 18 2017 09:13pm
Quote (Landmine @ Feb 18 2017 09:46pm)
The Russia narrative is idiotic at best. I'm sorry to tell you, but random websites that most people probably didn't see or care for didn't help Trump win the election.

Hillary Clinton had the full support of MSM and celebrity's and the support of the Obama administration. So to say random websites backed by Russia is the reason for Clintons loss is complete lunacy, but I don't expect much from the lefts equivalent to Nekosama.


"Random websites" wtf are you talking about?

Truly hilarious you can be that misinformed and accuse me of being a poor poster. Only dig anyone has against me is that I was wrong about Trump winning.

Really, to not know in what way Russia affected (decided) the election is... Sad!

This post was edited by Voyaging on Feb 18 2017 09:16pm
Member
Posts: 15,802
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
Feb 18 2017 09:22pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Feb 18 2017 08:13pm)
"Random websites" wtf are you talking about?

Truly hilarious you can be that misinformed and accuse me of being a poor poster. Only dig anyone has against me is that I was wrong about Trump winning.


So where did Russians interfere to make Hillary lose to Trump? If you say Wikileaks you're a nekosama conspiracy theorist of the left.



It's actually outrageous to believe any support given by the Russians would overcome that of the MSM and previous administration, but I know you'll fall further into the rabbit hole as you continue your madness.
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Feb 18 2017 09:30pm
Quote (Landmine @ 19 Feb 2017 03:22)
So where did Russians interfere to make Hillary lose to Trump? If you say Wikileaks you're a nekosama conspiracy theorist of the left.



It's actually outrageous to believe any support given by the Russians would overcome that of the MSM and previous administration, but I know you'll fall further into the rabbit hole as you continue your madness.


Good point. I mean what do the CIA know anyway?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 18 2017 09:31pm
Quote (Scaly @ Feb 18 2017 09:30pm)
Good point. I mean what do the CIA know anyway?


Yeah, what does every intelligence agency in the United States know? Less than Trump, that's for sure! He always told us how they don't know shit, and you can get informed watching Fox News!
Member
Posts: 15,802
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
Feb 18 2017 09:41pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 18 2017 08:31pm)
Yeah, what does every intelligence agency in the United States know? Less than Trump, that's for sure! He always told us how they don't know shit, and you can get informed watching Fox News!



Yes, because Wikileaks over CNN, ABC, Washington post, huffington, salon, Vox, BBC, and I'm sure I missed a few more. Also Obamas administration and celebrities pushing for Hillary was in no way equivalent to Wikileaks.

This post was edited by Landmine on Feb 18 2017 09:48pm
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Feb 18 2017 09:43pm
Quote (Landmine @ 18 Feb 2017 23:41)
WMD?

that doesn't count because the Democrat nominee voted to fight the Bush wars of Establishment Aggression based on the intel community WMD idea
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 18 2017 09:44pm
Quote (Landmine @ Feb 18 2017 09:41pm)
WMD?


Oh shit. They can be wrong? Gyes that means we can selectively dismiss anything that's inconvenient.

On the reasonable side we can just point out that this is the reverse situation, where the current administration wants them to say Russia isn't involved, but the evidence says it is.
Member
Posts: 15,802
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
Feb 18 2017 09:50pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 18 2017 08:44pm)
Oh shit. They can be wrong? Gyes that means we can selectively dismiss anything that's inconvenient.

On the reasonable side we can just point out that this is the reverse situation, where the current administration wants them to say Russia isn't involved, but the evidence says it is.



Seems their wrong a lot when a narrative is pushed through an administration. Which is exactly what the Obama administration did.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1105710581059106010615001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll