Quote (ferdia @ Apr 18 2024 11:15am)
If you hit an embassy, a proportionate response would be for them to hit one of yours. The sheer volume of ordinance used, and the type of weapons used, is a disproportionate, escalatory response. take any two countries.
Country A blows up an embassy
Country B launches ballistic missiles
thats a disproportionate response, regardless/irrespective of life lost (or not lost).
There are of course huge glaring considerations here:
1. Israel collectively punishing Palestine / their ethnic arab minorities (pick one), mass slaughter of civilians.
2. Iran telegraphing the attack, aiming at locations to ensure the minimum amount of fatalities.
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Apr 18 2024 12:09pm)
To hit an Israeli embassy would involve attacking another country as well though, wouldn't that be worse? To me that seems like more of an escalation
Regarding ordinance, if they used less nothing would have gotten through, the amount and timings were clearly intended to overwhelm AD and allow a small amount to hit. Iran knew this, everyone reporting on it while it was happening did as well, I was watching live most of the night and multiple analysts mentioned this before anything even arrived. That's why I don't view the amount as a big deal really.
The fact that Israel attacked multiple countries prior to Iran's response, is not relevant. What is relevant is the volume used by Iran. We are talking about escalated conflict. While most rationale people can agree that the Israeli government are the aggressors, that its an apartheid state, that its committing ethnic cleansing and genocide, brutalizing their minorities while they starve the palestinians dead, the point is whether Iran's response was disproportionate.
And the answer is clearly yes. The fact that Iran minimized the loss of life and is departed from Israels brutal collective punishment approach to a civilian population merely highlights that Iran is more humane (or say rather, less barbaric) then Israel, it does not change the fact that Iran's attack was a disproportionate response, irrespective of the fact that the loss of life was incredibly low. From a geo-political standpoint, it can be construed as a disproportionate response, especially when noting the inferiority complex of Israeli society "they want to wipe us off the map". A proportionate response, as I already said, would be for Iran to blow up an Israeli consulate/diplomatic mission.
We are not talking about right or wrong, morals or any of that fluff here. We are talking about a country launching a volume of weapons at another in response to an attack on a consulate/diplomatic mission.
very conscious this is the Russia topic. copy/paste this across in case you have any follow ups.
/moved from the Russia topic.