Splitting hairs in my opinion but sure it wasn't the embassy it was "the Iranian consulate annex building adjacent to the Iranian embassy"

I don't think that really changes anything personally but you are correct it wasn't the embassy.

It wasnt even the consulate building it was one building to the right.
And it changes a lot if it wasnt an embassy so we simply killed bunch of hezbollah members conspiring with IRGC members.
Both terror organizations and sovereign territory of iran

This post was edited by Many_Names on Apr 18 2024 12:01am

Nothing I've seen from any news outlet supports that, where did you get that info?

ABC, CNN, CBC, FOX, the Guardian, BBC, Axios, Reuters, and tons more have all reported it as either the embassy, consulate, consulate annex or embassy compound. So while I may be spreading propaganda by saying that you might want to take it up with those outlets.

I say a lot of outlandish things but I didn't think that was one of them lol

Guardian actually said it wasnt embassy

They called it a consulate or a "diplomatic compound"



https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/14/why-israel-attack-on-iranian-consulate-in-syria-was-a-gamechanger

So it wasnt an embassy

The ground Embassies are built on still belong to the country they are in.

I really don't know what you are arguing for at this point lol

I know, but the embassy country consider the building as its sovereign territory

If its not an embassy than its not a direct hit at iran.
Furthermore if we are debating at least know the facts.
It wasnt an embassy