http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/14/politics/clinton-campaign-releases-new-health-information/index.html

And for the record, Barack Obama wasn't born in Kenya.

Any more distractions? Just email em to HRC.

Time to release the taxes Trump. Only one candidate hasn't been forthright and transparent here.

This post was edited by Skinned on Sep 14 2016 03:11pm

fake records from a fake ass news site

Never going to happen. Not going to get his taxes, a full medical report, his bundler info. He's by far and away the least transparent nominee in modern history, and everybody knows why.



You're mischaracterizing the sum total of the intelligence gathered, then presented, in those reports, and the value of said intelligence on the basis of where it happened to come from.

Again, you don't get to choose which intelligence is valid. We can debate about the effectiveness of our intelligence-acquiring capabilities but you don't get to pick and choose which pieces of intelligence exist (and don't exist) based on whichever fringe narrative you're trying to advance. The fact that the attack was not motivated by the video, like peaceful demonstrations in other countries were, was obviously one of the reasons that the intelligence estimate changed and became more accurate, as we know it did. Just because they were able to eventually determine later on the correct cause of the attack does not mean that their initial incorrect assessment was made to deceive. Making that claim is disingenuous, and the conspiracy theorists have never been able to offer a shred of proof for it; only more CTs and non-sequiturs.

Bill says its the flu and she's fine.

bills never told a lie so i trust his word

You probably thought Obama was from Kenya too.

Believing a "medical information" released by the candidate team ?

Why not, a doctor can can talk about pneumonia while secondary effects of a stroke or why not parkison are in background, and claim everything "looks normal", on the first step...

In the same way we can read a bill with a very low Cholesterol rate, meaning the candidate is healthy ? Or maybe because he/she's sick and have to follow a strict diet now.


I would not trust them, and if you do: good luck !

Clinton herself obviously knew from the outset what the motivations were, we have her email to prove it. Anything else you want to call an "initial assessment" that contradicts what she already knew is proof of the lie about putting a false "initial assessment" out.

There's something very amusing about Trump supporters claiming Clinton's doctor, or her records, are fake after getting a glimpse of Trump's doctor and the way his not-medical report was transcribed.



Again I go back to this, because you're making the same mistake (well, it's not a mistake but the same deliberative choice that every other dead-ender makes) that the rest of the CTs do:



Just saying "Clinton sent this email" doesn't magically prove what you're alleging. That's a non-sequitur. Do you know what that email actually says? You actually have to have proof, supporting evidence, to be taken seriously on this. The email and what it says doesn't support what you're alleging. You're doing the same exact thing that the rest of the dead-enders have done, just reflexively pointing to the email as if its existence alone confirms some nefarious plot. It doesn't.

Something something saying the same thing over again doesn't make it true something something.

It proves that she knew inside of 24 hours what was going on. Sending someone out with "initial intelligence" saying something entirely different 120 hours later is not borne of a "changing intelligence estimate," it is a lie. If I didn't know the contents of the email, how in the actual fuck do you think I used the exact same term directly used in that email (al-quada-like group)? But allow me:



This post was edited by Santara on Sep 14 2016 04:35pm