Quote (Santara @ Sep 8 2016 04:19pm)
If it's "open and shut," where's the evidence? Because I quoted the 800 page report when I said:
And are you denying Clinton sent an email to Chelsea within 24 hours that blamed an "al quada-like" group? Don't dodge.
It's in those reports, mischaracterizing them won't make it go away. You don't get to choose which intelligence is valid based on what's convenient for whichever narrative of the fringe you're trying to advance at that moment, either. It's not unreasonable for them to see the unrest and riots in Tripoli and other countries and make the mistake they made initially. They got it right fairly quickly, the only reason there's a controversy is because Republican dead-enders keep peddling conspiracy theories because they don't want to do their jobs, and because they're terrified of having to compete in an election on records and policy positions.
Why do you think the simple fact that Clinton sent that email overrides what we know to be true: that the intelligence estimate changed (and became more accurate) over time? The existence of that email and what it says doesn't magically prove what you're trying to allege; that's been the fatal flaw in that "argument" the whole time. That's the problem with indulging this conspiracy theory: all you get is yet still more conspiracy theories behind it, rather than just the dead-enders simply adhering to the same evidence that the rest of us do.
And before you tell me all about how this all connects to Alex Jones' magical earpiece that Clinton wore at the IAVA event, I already know this body double is really a lizard person.