true or false, you saw this story including the child porn accusations weeks before it broke in public media on 4chan or a similar site?

And sitting members of congress and their offices.

This still doesnt prove that Hunter is a pedo. The more reasonable explanation is that he had a relapse and ran around his house naked and coked out of his mind while his daughter was around. Which is of course inappropriate and damning behavior, so his ex wife (or sister-in-law or whatever) threatened to use it to smear hunter or to leverage this incident in a family court, at which point his family, including his father, circled the wagons around him, etc.

Hanlon's razor: never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity - or, in this case, addiction.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Oct 28 2020 09:46am

People like Jim Jordan who have spent the past 4 years shredding their miniscule credibility are now supposed to get taken seriously?

The current Republican minority leader admitted 4 years ago they were using a committee to investigate Benghazi for political reasons.

Some of this material might be legitimate... but the purveyors of it are not. Full stop.

This post was edited by IceMage on Oct 28 2020 09:45am

The child's mother accused Hunter of being sexually inappropriate with her daughter and felt it was serious enough to cut off all contact between them and threaten to call the cops if he came around again, or go to the media. Then on top of that, we have pictures of Hunter Biden being clearly sexually inappropriate with that girl, exposing himself and posing with her. And on top of that, his computer had topless photos of her and other child pornography. I'm all for healthy skepticism and trying to imagine non-malicious explanations for evidence, but you don't accidentally save nude pics of your niece on your computer while on a bender.

If this is going to devolve into finessing the details to figure out just how much of a pedophile we're talking- the kind of "it was only the tip" debates, I don't think it matters too much. Whether it was full blown child sex abuse or just child endangerment and sexually inappropriate behavior with children- its all clearly well past the bounds.

What we can take away from it is that Biden's family, and Joe Biden himself, were clearly aware of Hunter's misadventures with children, and their reaction was to protect Hunter and malign the woman trying to protect her daughter. We can't know just how much the Biden family really knew- maybe they had a sincere belief that Hallie was lying- but now we have the evidence from the laptop that they (I hope) didn't have. That alone is enough for a disturbing story.

I don't disagree with you much other than the final paragraph. If we assume everything info wise is real, somehow verified, and what not, at no point does any of that point a finger at Joe unless there's something I missed where he says he knows and is covering. Most people don't want to think their kids are monsters.

Know that someone said something to him and not believe it and know for certain the way your first sentence implied are two diff things btw.

Rereading it, I think I mixed up a sentence in my head. The beginning and the end of the paragraph are two totally opposing suggestions.

This post was edited by Mangix on Oct 28 2020 10:07am

I don't think most people are qualified to be president of the united states. Its a question of judgment, and particularly damning considering the metoo movement was in full swing as those wagons circled.
These texts in particular show Joe Biden was made aware, directly from Jill & Hallie at a minimum



This post was edited by Goomshill on Oct 28 2020 10:11am

hmm?

the new york post is the 5th largest newspaper in the country

A week before the election Gooms desparation is rising. His sanity may crack any day