d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Atheist / Agnostic Thread
Prev1100101102103104193Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Jul 23 2015 10:01am
Quote (Superman @ Jul 23 2015 10:32am)
This is an similar example of what you guys are doing when trying to understand The Bible.

Example
My name is John and this guy named Jane was chanting death to america and pulled out a firearm and started to shoot people. As he started to turn towards me, I shot him in self defense.

Person A: John said Death to America, he's a terrorist, arrest him!
Person B: Read everything, that's not what John meant at all!


i'm not making explicit claims about the bible

i simply observe that interpretations of religious texts have varied over centuries to suit various agendas and i find it cute when someone thinks that they and they're generation alone finally got it right after all these centuries and all the fools before them had just misinterpreted everything - talk about arrogance~

now i haven't read the bible so i could be missing the context and not interpreting things the right way ~ i could be wrong in taking these verses at face value right? :thumbsup:

yet the consideration for time/place/history to establish an appropriate context within which to properly interpret verses that you ask of me is not a consideration that you afford other religions and we end up getting retarded threads like this http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=72952202&f=119

tbh i don't really care if the bible is misinterpreted to bash it given that your people have absolutely no problem doing the same to other religions
Member
Posts: 10,566
Joined: May 31 2013
Gold: 0.76
Jul 23 2015 10:30am
Quote (Superman @ 23 Jul 2015 10:32)
This is an similar example of what you guys are doing when trying to understand The Bible.

Example
My name is John and this guy named Jane was chanting death to america and pulled out a firearm and started to shoot people. As he started to turn towards me, I shot him in self defense.

Person A: John said Death to America, he's a terrorist, arrest him!
Person B: Read everything, that's not what John meant at all!



Superman=terrorist
Member
Posts: 6,236
Joined: Sep 17 2005
Gold: 38,059.00
Jul 23 2015 10:35am
Quote (El Shadday @ Jul 23 2015 03:18pm)
believe this information to state even more absolute ignorance of the true message of Jesus that repealed all the old testament.
We consider only the consoling messages and only goal and exclusively MORAL.
the remainder should be dispensable.




Complement his argument saying that the interpretation is individual and each person has his only moment of awakening to the truth. :hug:



The true message of Jesus is lost in translation.
Member
Posts: 5,027
Joined: Oct 1 2007
Gold: 2,348.00
Jul 23 2015 10:40am
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 23 2015 03:52pm)
You're employing quite a bit of confirmation bias here IMO. and conjecture as well. The modern state, where stealing is considered faux paux without religious motivation, is the direct result of thousands of years of a religious system, where not stealing was at the very least partially motivated by religious beliefs. So we basically live in a day and age where religion has less of an effect than it used to, but our morality and cultural norms are somewhat based on the religious norms of the past. Would stealing have been taboo'd without any religion in the world, perhaps but we cannot conclusively say, all we can say is religion did help form the social norms we currently have. Past cultures would poison wells, steal women and resources, and cripple the men when they conquered other kingdoms. So there is some historical precedence for stealing being socially acceptable, the people you stole from just needed to be part of another social group you were against to justify it.


well, i dont see a confirmation bias here since we do not really have a thesis to confirm.
Taking a look at the animal kingdom we see some species which penalty stealing. The intersting thing about this, to make the conection to your next statement :), is that stealing is only a bad thing if it accures ingroup.
Religion gave a not so nice future for those who violate the social norms. Back in the days it was pretty hard to find out who was the thief, so a higher instance was needed (one from which was belief that he/she/it does know everything and so will judge everything). Lets say some form of aversive stimulie which will be aplyed somewhere in the past, or even after your dead.
Anyway, (marginal) group think is a very common phenomena in human. Put half of a school-class into red shirts and the other half in blue ones and you might be able to watch a nice one gang-fight. We tend to be group-social beeings which might be a good thing to survive (at least in the past). Today people use religious symbos, nationalities, colour of your skin and and and to divide up people into groups. Thats something freaking dangerous. This "we" and "the others" thinking might lead to evil things, just like they have happened in the past. Pretty ot now, sorry therefor, but over here we got some politicians who are sailing this corse and it makes me fucking mad :(

sorry for the crapy english. i have applyed to much beer and political rage to myself :D

This post was edited by Wirbelschwein on Jul 23 2015 10:42am
Retired Moderator
Posts: 15,536
Joined: Apr 3 2006
Gold: 848.00
Trader: Trusted
Jul 23 2015 10:44am
Quote (Diablokgb @ 23 Jul 2015 13:35)
The true message of Jesus is lost in translation.


the translation is simple and unique, the law of love.
it's the only way for humanity. :thumbsup:
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Jul 23 2015 10:45am
Quote (Diablokgb @ Jul 23 2015 12:35pm)
The true message of Jesus is lost in translation.


...it most certainly is not .
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jul 23 2015 10:52am
Quote (Wirbelschwein @ Jul 23 2015 10:40am)
well, i dont see a confirmation bias here since we do not really have a thesis to confirm.
Taking a look at the animal kingdom we see some species which penalty stealing. The intersting thing about this, to make the conection to your next statement :), is that stealing is only a bad thing if it accures ingroup.
Religion gave a not so nice future for those who violate the social norms. Back in the days it was pretty hard to find out who was the thief, so a higher instance was needed (one from which was belief that he/she/it does know everything and so will judge everything). Lets say some form of aversive stimulie which will be aplyed somewhere in the past, or even after your dead.
Anyway, (marginal) group think is a very common phenomena in human. Put half of a school-class into red shirts and the other half in blue ones and you might be able to watch a nice one gang-fight. We tend to be group-social beeings which might be a good thing to survive (at least in the past). Today people use religious symbos, nationalities, colour of your skin and and and to divide up people into groups. Thats something freaking dangerous. This "we" and "the others" thinking might lead to evil things, just like they have happened in the past. Pretty ot now, sorry therefor, but over here we got some politicians who are sailing this corse and it makes me fucking mad :(

sorry for the crapy english. i have applyed to much beer and political rage to myself :D


The thesis i was applying it to was that: Not stealing is common sense and would have been a societal taboo regardless of the presence of religion.

We live in a society built on the back of an incredibly religious society, its impossible to say what would have been based on the societal norms we have.
Member
Posts: 5,027
Joined: Oct 1 2007
Gold: 2,348.00
Jul 23 2015 12:45pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 23 2015 04:52pm)
The thesis i was applying it to was that: Not stealing is common sense and would have been a societal taboo regardless of the presence of religion.

We live in a society built on the back of an incredibly religious society, its impossible to say what would have been based on the societal norms we have.


not. common sense would be stealing, because you take whatever you can get.
Not stealing is a social norm (nowerdays a law) and you are punished if you violate it.
Call it a religious motivated social norm if you like to.
There is still no need for a higher beeing in all of this. We can explain social norms pretty well just by group-think and internalisation processes.
Every social life-form has its rules to follow. For example for the lions: the boss eats first. I dont think that lions need any form of religioun (not even to mention any high instance) to establish this rules.
So whats the crucial difference between dont steal and the boss eats first?
Member
Posts: 48,673
Joined: Jul 5 2008
Gold: 0.00
Jul 23 2015 01:16pm
Quote (duffman316 @ 23 Jul 2015 10:01)
i'm not making explicit claims about the bible

i simply observe that interpretations of religious texts have varied over centuries to suit various agendas and i find it cute when someone thinks that they and they're generation alone finally got it right after all these centuries and all the fools before them had just misinterpreted everything - talk about arrogance~

now i haven't read the bible so i could be missing the context and not interpreting things the right way ~ i could be wrong in taking these verses at face value right? :thumbsup:

yet the consideration for time/place/history to establish an appropriate context within which to properly interpret verses that you ask of me is not a consideration that you afford other religions and we end up getting retarded threads like this http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=72952202&f=119

tbh i don't really care if the bible is misinterpreted to bash it given that your people have absolutely no problem doing the same to other religions


Sorry, I'm not going to show any respect to the religion of the sword.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Jul 23 2015 01:25pm
Quote (Superman @ Jul 23 2015 02:16pm)
Sorry, I'm not going to show any respect to the religion of the sword.


i probably have more problems with islam than you do but in the absence of any muslims to defend the religion i don't like the mindless attacks on it taking parts of it out of context just because it suits an islamaphobic agenda the right is so fond of
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1100101102103104193Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll