So if China invades Japan, defeats it, and takes its land, this is morally acceptable to you?

is an open and proud anti-semite & white supremacist (even though he is by his own admission not white himself, he worships my people for some reason) who openly admits he wants the eradication of the Jewish people

He intentionally pretends to not understand simple and easily comprehensible statements in bad faith

That's a rather extreme example. Take the forced population transfers at the end of the second world war. Is that acceptable to you?

There is no Palestine it was the Ottoman Empire which was prior to the world war. The naivety of some people.

I don't have a problem with Israel wanting a secure border, but that doesn't seem like what they are doing. They seem to be encroaching on more and more land. They are quietly expanding their border. This is an offensive action, not something defensive like "we just want to secure our border".

That is a very bad example.

You should ask if China Invades Taiwan which is more likely to happen.

And you should feel flattered.

Also, she, not he.



I never said that. Quote me as saying that, or apologize.



Sounds like you are mad that I destroyed your arguments.



It's an exaggerated example to illustrate the corollary of your statements: victors can impose conditions upon the vanquished, borders are not absolute... etc etc. You are essentially saying that nations can just go to war with another nation and if they win, they can impose whatever they want on the defeated nation, including taking their land.



I am not familiar with this. Can you elaborate so I can respond.

They deserved it / had it coming for terrorizing Palestinians years on end before they were even conceived

Seriously though (and as in the Ukraine thread), the distinction between unprovoked and unjustified cannot be stressed enough. Understanding the grievances of the parties involved is perhaps the first step at creating a real solution.

What led Hamas to cultivate this state of terror in the people that follow?

why is there an acceptance for killing civilians & children as a retaliation to the terror attack.
Nobody should of been mad at the US invasions/bombings if that was the case.
Justified bombing is a thing for Israel but not for other countries.. The defense of mass military attacks over (admittedly horrible) terrorist action is very strange.

I guess they are Muslim so its ok?