Quote (musclemagic @ Dec 14 2022 02:00pm)
I'm thinking you're correct, but I don't understand the reference at all. Tyranny of minority is an interesting sounding concept, especially with "of abortion" slapped on the end.
again, just a guess, where there is a minority ruling body (say, in a company, politicians in a country, owners of a web site etc.) and they dictate the narrative, I presume this then equates to tyranny, where the few control the masses. following on: certain topic's are very divisive, and therefore I presume that Abortion, and topic's relating to same, on JSP, has been used as an example (of what can not be openly discussed).
i think thats what is being inferred.
this goes back to what I always say in this subforum : if you have a stated view, please be very clear sothat anyone can understand it. obviously there are alot of people that dont have a view, have an uninformed or immature view but what really grates is when people have a view but dont clearly state it.
Here is an example:
I am personally against abortion as a principal but I will vote for abortion sothat a woman will not be constrained by my personal view from doing what she feels she has to / needs to do. If my wife wants an abortion we would have a conversation like adults. all my conversations with my wife go as follows: she tells me what to do and i agree.
most people wont clearly state their view like that, for a variety of reasons (troll/fear/insert here reason).
This post was edited by ferdia on Dec 14 2022 08:28am