Quote (masl @ Jul 19 2022 10:28am)
No it isn't she has the freedom to drink whenever she wants.
Which slogans? you are the one with republican talking points. "human beings are legally murdered"
The bill is there so the government needs to fuck off when a women and doctors decide over her body.
Again what gives the government authority do decide such thing? Without any expertice on the issue.
Those people have no clue when abortions happen and why. And they have no clue what a human being is.
honestly, you are disgusting. Abortions as birth control?
You fell so hard for that Team Red abortion propaganda it's not even funny anymore.
The bill is there so the discussion is between the patient and a doctor and not some 3rd party
This happens every day. People are extremely vocal about it nowadays.
You are coming from a place where you are 100% determined that at no point is a fetus a human being. You claim I don’t know, but you do. Science does not determine when the fetus should be considered a human. This is a
moral decision. What you are passionately defending says at no point are they humans and therefore kill them whenever. You are completely dismissing those who passionately believe there are murders being committed.
Imagine this situation is on any other issue besides abortion. Let’s say it revolves around senile people ages 85+. Society has gotten (devolved, my word) to a place where it is somewhat commonly accepted that they are no longer able to survive on their own, and their conscience is no longer. There is a debate whether or not they are people or sacks of meat that have become a financial and mental burden.
Now in this hypothetical situation, the federal government passed (or attempted to like is happening here) a sweeping bill federalizing the legality of murdering these seemingly useless human beings.
Not everybody has insurance to have nurses and be in a home, the burden gets placed solely on the children of the now dependent. They never asked to have to take care of this human, they are not financially capable of caring for them. It would cause hardship for the family to simply keep the human alive, even though they have no idea where they are or what is happening around them. Completely senile.
I don’t see much of a difference, besides my hypothetical situation involves a person receiving a financial and mental burden by absolutely no fault of their own. No single decision they have made put themselves in the situation where they have to care for this human.
So should we be talking about this? This happened to me four years ago when I was faced with leave my father to die alone in his house or do everything I can on my dime to care for him because nobody else would. I never once thought about how great it would be if we could just kill him legally.
Quote (masl @ Jul 19 2022 11:01am)
If you ban abortions they still gonna happen. If not a doctor is doing it the good old metal hanger will do it np. But then actual human beings will die.
you aren't saving lifes if you ban abortions you destroy them.
Majority of anti abortionists are religious nut jobs. wtf are you talking about?
You ask for proof that late term abortions happen just because, then bring up coat hanger abortions. Your argument is reaching to every far corner it can to find coherence.
There is zero need for this bill. We aren’t even discussing banning abortions, that has never been a topic of conversation in this thread. Abortion on demand up until birth exists in Colorado. That is not changing. Late term abortions exist in several state laws, that is not changing.
I posted a map of abortion laws comparing the US to Europe. There was
one state with more restrictive laws than
All of the western world. 49 states had similar or much less restrictive laws already.
The bill proposed here turns every state into Colorado, when Colorado exists already and isn’t going anywhere.
This post was edited by YeeHaw on Jul 19 2022 10:12am