Quote (Black XistenZ @ 2 May 2022 10:16)
There's actually a very simple argument to be made for favoring having children over importing immigrants to stabilize one's contry's demographics: it's more reliable. Children born to native parents will automatically pick up their country's culture, values, education and all that. If born in sufficient number, they will almost by definition be good enough to keep the country going.
By contrast, if you try to solve a demographic crisis via immigration, you rely on a sufficient number compatible immigrants being available/wanting to come to your country. The more distant the culture and socialization/upbringing of immigrants, the greater the risk that they fail to assimilate or don't actually have the required qualifications and work ethic. In any case, the integration of foreigners binds resources and causes friction. And with more and more emerging countries seeing declines in their birthrate, the well will dry up in the forseeable future anyway. Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, China - all these places will hit their peak population within the next 20 years and enter population decline. Once a country realizes that plugging its demographic holes with immigrants doesn't work anymore, it will be too late to turn things around by investing in domestic families and birth rates.
You forgot the third way, that a good part of the immigrants integrate themselves, generation after generation.
Yet we have to say this fails much more when you start to put too much of them directly into ghetto without an integration structures (social security, decently paid job opportunities, Ids, learning national language etc)
Sweden failed hard at this game: they took too much, too fast.