Does anyone know why Romney vote for her confirmation now while he voted against her just one year ago during her confirmation to the DC circuit?
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1171/vote_117_1_00231.htm

A current article doesn't give any meaningful explanation for his change of heart:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/senate-poised-confirm-ketanji-brown-jackson-supreme-court-rcna23283


I highly doubt that Jackson's judicial philosophy or her personality changed meaningfully over the span of this one year, so what is the true reason? Was this yet another "Romney sucks up to the DC establishment"-moment?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 8 2022 03:15am

I just hope that, in time, she will understand what she is, a woman.

Her wiki should say “first black female”. Tired of 99% bending over for a whiny nonfunctional 1%. I know the law men can get pregnant huehuehue

Isn't that the muscular dude with that weird hair who doesn't know what a 'woman' is?

LOL, you need more copium please. You guys are so mad she didn't take the obvious bait. Lol. I've been at the hospital all night taking care of a loved one and am now doing to a different hospital to work and take care of other peoples' loved ones, and this is the boost of copium I needed to at least get through my morning cases.

It is funny that incels keep asking what a woman is; one day you too might know a woman.

A real philosophical answer is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Second_Sex

But that answer is from a woman so you're not interested; you only want a females opinion when you want to attack it and call it stupid, like in this instance, where she didn't take the bait.



And the incels are raging with their angry little inches

This post was edited by Skinned on Apr 8 2022 05:39am

Nowadays, woman is a dated politically incorrect term. We now refer to them as "birthing people", "chest feeders", or "bleeders".

According to the woke libs.

If you think it's just the "incels" who are pissed about CRT, affirmative action, and gender identity, you are in for a rude awakening this midterm.

Or you could save yourself the shock and check the polls.



This post was edited by player11167 on Apr 8 2022 05:42am

because he is an opportunist first and foremost

that said Jackson didnt really have anything that set off the alarms from a judicial philosophy standpoint so her being confirmed is good. we can be assured anytime a (D) nominee is up for the SC the focus will be on jurisprudence and not some tabloid rumors turning into a slimey media spectacle when a (R) nominee is up

absolutely you are.





no such thing.



no such thing.

I think what he is trying to say is that discriminating on peoples race in an attempt to make up for historic imbalances is still discriminating on race

Noone is advocating for all white all the time