I'm not a Democrat though, and most liberals aren't either.

Democrats are the closest aligned major party, but that isn't saying much since there's only two real parties.

If you had any self awareness you would realize that Trump barely winning to a "not sane candidate" only after major interference in his favor is the actual self pwn.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 18 2020 11:03am

Say that to Trump, he'll laugh so hard you won't believe it. Pls record it

Oh btw he'll also explain to you that certain big tech companies run by lefties were actually the major factor interfering in the elections and he'll laugh even harder. In your face.

You libs were pwned son

You are conveniently ignoring the fact that intellectual, political, economic, media, entertainment and functional elites were siding with one candidate and against the other to an absolutely unprecedented degree. Just like you are ignoring the fact that Hillary outspent Trump by a huge, never-seen-before 2:1 margin. Trump pulling off the victory in spite of the cards being that stacked against him is not a small feat.

And djunior is of course spot on when he says that Trump could never have won if Democrats had nominated anyone but Hillary, who was the most awful, toxic, unbearable candidate in literally half a century.

Somebody please inset he still your president here”
Stop
The long essays defending the biggest loser in WH history

Im not approaching a "who pwned who" debate with much effort.

You can't much say that Hillary is a shit candidate and then brag about winning with the narrowest margin in history. If she got all those resources on her side thats a point for her being a competitive candidate so its contradictory.

lol no, it's a point for her being the pinnacle of a swamp demon

So is it impressive to overcome the media, or not impressive because it hurts her for being a swamp demon?

You're trying to have it both ways.

I think trump has picked a few swamp demons that have surpassed her now