d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Remember, Its Illegal To Possess These Emails
Prev1910111213127Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,915
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Oct 15 2020 07:24am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 15 2020 08:09am)
in a world where even if youre caught red handed faking them half the country still thinks they're real and half thought they were fake all along.

and im sure some maybe even most of them are real, the best lies aren't flavored with a sprinkle of the truth like the old adage says, the BEST lies are truth sprinkled with a bit of lies.

for all i know they are 100% real, but the assumption they are is foolish and naïve.


I mean lets follow this hypothetical
There's such a gigantic amount of verifiable evidence that we'd have to assume that 'most' of it is real
but we could suppose that they took a few lies and sprinkled them into thousands of truths
That's exactly what democrats said back in 2016 in an attempt to diminish and deflect from the DNC emails: The media was shouting that the russians could have faked some of them and stuck them into a server full of real ones
well it turned out in that case, nope, not a single one was fake
but if we were to suppose that here, then all we'd have to do is narrowly focus on the few notable emails and examine whether they have any flaws or signs of fabrication
but there's nothing to indicate that

We've got a perfectly explicable chain of custody, we've got a whole bunch of emails and pictures we can examine ourselves, and the FBI has had possession of the hard drive for a year- and they don't say its fake or point out any such flaws
Member
Posts: 50,915
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 15 2020 07:28am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 15 2020 09:12am)
the 4th amendment doesnt define what evidence is, just how it was apprehended.

again, read a book. the small constitution books should be short enough for u, just no pictures.

i can find a youtube video for you to explain basic rights to you with some cool diagrams tho im sure.


double standard lmao, ive said that from the start the Bidens were likely guilty of enriching themselves via Ukraine.


Defrauding investors when you portray yourself as a neutral utility.

FEC violations for in kind contributions to the DNC.

Ten times less evidence was required for Dinesh Dsouza.

This is an easy case.

Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 15 2020 09:26am)



Seize the servers.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Oct 15 2020 07:29am
Member
Posts: 40,248
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 5,737.99
Oct 15 2020 07:33am
The usual deflection from the usual suspects. Joe Biden’s son smokes crack, sO wHaT, tRuMp WoRkEd oN wAlLsTrEeT iN tHe 80s, It’s selective outrage. They’ll cry about one of Trump’s kids coming out with a book, & in the same breathe ignore a foreign nation paying the son of the VP millions of dollars for access to his father. Imagine if one of Trump’s sons was paid millions of dollars from an energy company in a country that he’s never been to, doesn’t speak the language, & has literally zero experience in said field, all to gain access to his father. The same father who said he never discussed any of this with his son, which we now know is a blatant lie. If this was (R) Trump & not (D) Biden the left would be torrentially crying about it, however it’s not Trump, so they deflect & minimize.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Oct 15 2020 07:35am
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 15 2020 09:26am)


About time. Twitter is so beneath the office of POTUS.


Quote (IgoSoHard @ Oct 15 2020 09:33am)
The usual deflection from the usual suspects. Joe Biden’s son smokes crack, sO wHaT, tRuMp WoRkEd oN wAlLsTrEeT iN tHe 80s, It’s selective outrage. They’ll cry about one of Trump’s kids coming out with a book, & in the same breathe ignore a foreign nation paying the son of the VP millions of dollars for access to his father. Imagine if one of Trump’s sons was paid millions of dollars from an energy company in a country that he’s never been to, doesn’t speak the language, & has literally zero experience in said field, all to gain access to his father. The same father who said he never discussed any of this with his son, which we now know is a blatant lie. If this was (R) Trump & not (D) Biden the left would be torrentially crying about it, however it’s not Trump, so they deflect & minimize.


Trump's son hurts animals, plays with fire, and pisses the bed still.

This post was edited by Skinned on Oct 15 2020 07:36am
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Oct 15 2020 07:39am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 15 2020 05:56am)
"would someone really take the time to fake thousands of emails and/or photos (to potentially sway a presidential election)"

i'm not saying they are fake, but holy shit goomy thats some next level naivety driven by confirmation bias. come, on, man.


this is literally some dude in an office.
" create an IT group and make some dirt up on the Bidens"
effort level.. ZERO
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Oct 15 2020 07:39am
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Oct 15 2020 06:33am)
The usual deflection from the usual suspects. Joe Biden’s son smokes crack, sO wHaT, tRuMp WoRkEd oN wAlLsTrEeT iN tHe 80s, It’s selective outrage. They’ll cry about one of Trump’s kids coming out with a book, & in the same breathe ignore a foreign nation paying the son of the VP millions of dollars for access to his father. Imagine if one of Trump’s sons was paid millions of dollars from an energy company in a country that he’s never been to, doesn’t speak the language, & has literally zero experience in said field, all to gain access to his father. The same father who said he never discussed any of this with his son, which we now know is a blatant lie. If this was (R) Trump & not (D) Biden the left would be torrentially crying about it, however it’s not Trump, so they deflect & minimize.


nothingburger
Member
Posts: 1,203
Joined: Jan 3 2018
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Oct 15 2020 07:47am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 15 2020 08:28am)
Defrauding investors when you portray yourself as a neutral utility.

FEC violations for in kind contributions to the DNC.

Ten times less evidence was required for Dinesh Dsouza.

This is an easy case.




Seize the servers.


If it were an easy case to make Barr would have had it done ready.

Trump literally owns the DOJ and no charges filed against all these people Trump claims are criminals.

....then we look at the Trump administration and allllllll those charges... by Trumls DoJ
Member
Posts: 50,915
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Oct 15 2020 07:48am
Quote (Skinned @ Oct 15 2020 08:35am)
About time. Twitter is so beneath the office of POTUS.


But its okay for Joe Biden's campaign to keep tweeting :santa:

Quote (MizzouFTW @ Oct 15 2020 08:47am)
If it were an easy case to make Barr would have had it done ready.

Trump literally owns the DOJ and no charges filed against all these people Trump claims are criminals.

....then we look at the Trump administration and allllllll those charges... by Trumls DoJ


afaik most of this is outside american jurisdiction
there's very little in the way of foreign anti-corruption clauses- the ones rarely enforced and nebulous at best- to prosecute americans for corruption in sovereign nations
it would be the responsibility of those governments to enforce their own laws
and Joe Biden helped overthrow that government and replace it with his own people
and when the top prosecutor looked at his son, Joe Biden forced him out by withholding foreign aid and his handpicked replacement used his powers of discretion to no longer investigate burisma and biden


What is the DoJ supposed to do here? No court has claimed novel jurisdiction over something so far outside their wheelhouse since either the Nuremberg Trials or the ICC

This post was edited by Goomshill on Oct 15 2020 07:50am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 15 2020 07:49am
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 15 2020 05:05am)
You don't understand what's scandalous about overthrowing the democratically elected government of a country and then stealing its wealth away from the people and giving it to your own family, and shaking them down with the threat of withholding foreign aid if they investigate it? Its not the united state's interests at heart when millions of dollars are put into the Biden family coffers

I mean its been less than a year since the house democrats voted to impeach Trump for merely asking Ukraine to look into this scandal, without that same overt threat to withhold aid as leverage. And in that case, instead of seeking to line his own pockets out of greed, Trump was seeking to expose wrongdoing by Biden to benefit himself. And the folks arranging that whole impeachment narrative were the same folks involved in Joe Biden's corruption in Ukraine- Eric Ciaramella the 'whistleblower' was Joe Biden's Ukraine specialist.

Ever since Trump first ran for president, we've been getting this endless cycle of democrats outraged over the false accusation that Trump did something unethical that they actually did


I'm not saying I like that we do it, I'm saying overthrowing democratically elected governments and stealing it's wealth away is incredibly normal for the United States.

I'm gonna melt your brain right here. Trump can be in the wrong asking for an investigation because he had no reason to, and the issue can be worthy of investigation due to facts that come out later. Trump didn't have a reason to launch an investigation and only did it when Biden became his political opponent for president.

Also, there could well be other reasons to do what he did. Plaguefear suggested the one who was removed was corrupt, it's very possible that he was and that was a good reason to remove him. We'll see how this evolves.

Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 15 2020 08:48am)
But its okay for Joe Biden's campaign to keep tweeting :santa:


He's not POTUS.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 15 2020 07:49am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1910111213127Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll