It's mostly just because there are glaring issues and people get the right idea that probably will never be addressed , so people are easily riled and reactionary attitudes prevail.

Exilecon put some hope in people but I think people are too wishful if they think the game is going to stop going in the direction it has been. They won't even do end league content anymore because it won't make money, they rather just blast out content on the 3 month cycle to hit the numbers they need to. Even more so now that tencent is their overlords. I think tencent is mostly not giving them any real demands but if GGG growth slows down, money talks. And also , the game getting faster and faster has been making them more money so it's unlikely that changes and the reddit hivemind can't accept this and then you even got some people who don't even know what they truly want, they get nostalgic about the game pre 3.0 but they probably wouldn't even enjoy playing pre 3.0 PoE experience now.

A and B are mutually exclusive

A happened, therefore B didn't happen
but... there is a non-zero probability that you only think A happened, but actually B happened. And if B happened, you are wrong that A happened.

See, you don't actually understand what you're talking about. You just know how to parrot buzzwords without a firm understanding of the underlying indeas. It's why people with business majors think they're superstars and people who do research are painfully aware of how limited their knowledge is. You live every day as a stereotype, the business major who hasn't gone through rigorous training and so they don't have any clue how complicated things actually are. You get the nice surface level statistics education for business majors. You don't understand why or how these things are derived and because of that you don't know where to apply them. You've just been told where to apply them and go with it like that's gospel.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 27 2020 09:17am

Everyone here can either conform or deny i posted post 65. I don't need 3deep5me parallel universe tinfoil-tier explanations to give a straightforward answer.

You're defying the laws of physics and fundamental laws of logic that have been settled by early Greeks. Like lol.

I was joking i havent read into the particular topic and dont think it'd be productive to do so either

This post was edited by duffman316 on May 27 2020 09:22am

Yep, that's about what I expected. You aren't capable of understanding so you just start parroting buzzwords.

There is nothing that violates the laws of physics about what I said. It's always a non-zero probability that everybody who looks at post 65 is mistaken about the author. Hell, maybe it doesn't even need them to be mistaken. Maybe it says you posted it but the server glitched out and I was the one who posted it. There are dozens of ways I can arrange things that make your claim incorrect, and all of them have non-zero probabilities.

When your standard is absolutist you lose the ability to draw any conclusions.

the election-denying failed petri-dish licker is arguing that “fact checking” a future hypothetical is a proper exercise

TIL that Obama saying "if you like your doctor you can keep it" was totally truthful because that was in the future and there was a nonzero probability that everyone would keep their doctors.

Nature of truth. There is an orthodoxy and a paradigm. There is a right way until there's another right way and the old right way isn't right anymore. This is the pragmatic theory of truth.

There is also correspondence theory and coherency theory of truth.

A fun thing to do is try to explain truth is without using the word truth or a word that means truth. You get something stupid like 'that which is" as if atomic reality isn't sent through senses and constructed mentally in a way that makes sense to us ie Transcendental Idealism or a weird epiphenominalism or whatever.


This post was edited by Skinned on May 27 2020 09:40am

Well, if twitter had simply fact checked Donald Trump's claims that he could win the 2016 election as "false" we could have President Hillary Clinton today, rather than President Trump.

Didn't you know that Twitter has all the facts?!

Got suspended for this post?

Not sure what is controversial.

This post was edited by Skinned on May 27 2020 09:40am