Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 25 2020 03:25pm)
Some issues lend themselves to private action and others don't. Fighting climate change or pollution is not something individuals will ever be able to effectively do on their own. It will require fundamentally reorienting our economy. This is something we could have started on in 1980 with government action on climate change, but no amount of individual action would come close to making a difference on the big issues.
The more fundamental an issue is to the economy the less likely an individual with lots of money can make a difference. Malaria can be fought by Bill Gates because it doesn't require fundamentally changing how others with similar amounts of wealth act.
correct, "environmentalist" isn't "climate change" inherently.
and in the best case scenario Bernie wins, and the entire senate flips blue, and the house stay blue, and Bernie legislates US polluter corporations to hell, and they move business to mexico and the earth's temperature keeps climbing. then it is on the individual action of consumers to shun those brands to try and make corporations do what the government cant, change. boy, i can't wait.
typically when i talk about carbon capture or another unknown technological solve to climate change im just lumped into the group of corporate apologists, o well. the fact is we're past the point of no return, the industrializing world (and even more industrialized nations like India and China) that we have no control over are going to make more pollution moving forward. we can squabble over who is a good boy for voting in the primary to sick the govt on corporations in the meantime tho. this simply isn't a problem in 2020 that can be solved by laws, unless those laws are "you can't make anything unless u also remove carbon from that atmosphere", a law that likely the scotus would strike down. its just too late. we need an Elon, bill gates, or Boyan Slatt type character to save us now.