d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Why Is There No Green Right Movement?
Prev191011
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Feb 25 2020 03:34pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 25 2020 03:25pm)
Some issues lend themselves to private action and others don't. Fighting climate change or pollution is not something individuals will ever be able to effectively do on their own. It will require fundamentally reorienting our economy. This is something we could have started on in 1980 with government action on climate change, but no amount of individual action would come close to making a difference on the big issues.

The more fundamental an issue is to the economy the less likely an individual with lots of money can make a difference. Malaria can be fought by Bill Gates because it doesn't require fundamentally changing how others with similar amounts of wealth act.


correct, "environmentalist" isn't "climate change" inherently.

and in the best case scenario Bernie wins, and the entire senate flips blue, and the house stay blue, and Bernie legislates US polluter corporations to hell, and they move business to mexico and the earth's temperature keeps climbing. then it is on the individual action of consumers to shun those brands to try and make corporations do what the government cant, change. boy, i can't wait.

typically when i talk about carbon capture or another unknown technological solve to climate change im just lumped into the group of corporate apologists, o well. the fact is we're past the point of no return, the industrializing world (and even more industrialized nations like India and China) that we have no control over are going to make more pollution moving forward. we can squabble over who is a good boy for voting in the primary to sick the govt on corporations in the meantime tho. this simply isn't a problem in 2020 that can be solved by laws, unless those laws are "you can't make anything unless u also remove carbon from that atmosphere", a law that likely the scotus would strike down. its just too late. we need an Elon, bill gates, or Boyan Slatt type character to save us now.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Feb 25 2020 04:02pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Feb 25 2020 04:02pm)
translated: i vote so i dont need to do anything else and i can sleep in on saturdays.

but sure, feel free to invalidate anything that doesnt line up with "the state is my band aid and it heals all wounds".

its just funny how "the right doesnt care about the environment" turns into "that kind of environmentalism doesnt count because it proves they care but i dont like it". the right likes to get their hands dirty, the left likes to pay others to do it while convincing themselves its for the best because honestly they dont even know where to start. its "i'll take my PC to best buy to get fixed" mentality with an added layer of faux moral superiority.

organizations like the ones you're maligning have been responsible for bringing endangered species back from the brink and turning sludge waterways into healthy waterways. but you're right that they haven't combated climate change very effectively. and all of those far right preppers living off solar and trying to ween themselves off of corporate food/energy sources clearly havent done as much as the average city dwelling hipster with a bernie bumper sticker......


You don't know what I do in my home. I can pay taxes and separate my trash while bringing my own bags to the grocery.

I give money to the organizations I'm 'maligning'. ECO locally and Sierra Club nationally. I also participate in other charities that would not be effective in combating climate change poverty or inequality on a large scale. They are a Band-Aid on a cancer.

By your logic a person with schizophrenia should just go to church and not have state sponsored case management available with medicaid paying for psychotropic meds and to keep someone out of institutions. Or that going to church is the same thing as assertive community treatment and the difference is preference when the difference is efficacy too.

I'm not saying that your hydro flask activism has no place. Sk sk sk.

This post was edited by Skinned on Feb 25 2020 04:06pm
Member
Posts: 6,517
Joined: Oct 22 2005
Gold: 12.79
Feb 25 2020 05:44pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 25 2020 04:25pm)
Some issues lend themselves to private action and others don't. Fighting climate change or pollution is not something individuals will ever be able to effectively do on their own. It will require fundamentally reorienting our economy. This is something we could have started on in 1980 with government action on climate change, but no amount of individual action would come close to making a difference on the big issues.

The more fundamental an issue is to the economy the less likely an individual with lots of money can make a difference. Malaria can be fought by Bill Gates because it doesn't require fundamentally changing how others with similar amounts of wealth act.


It's ok, according to the "climate scientists" of the 70s, we're all already dead.

edit: and the 80s, and the 90s, and the 00s.

edit edit: when did al gore say we'd all be fucked by?

edit edit edit: currently coutning down AOC/Gretas predictions

This post was edited by LA-Leviathan on Feb 25 2020 05:45pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 25 2020 06:05pm
Quote (LA-Leviathan @ Feb 25 2020 05:44pm)
It's ok, according to the "climate scientists" of the 70s, we're all already dead.

edit: and the 80s, and the 90s, and the 00s.

edit edit: when did al gore say we'd all be fucked by?

edit edit edit: currently coutning down AOC/Gretas predictions


Can you cite the specific practicing scientists who made the claims you are referencing? Because aoc Greta and Gore aren't scientists
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Feb 25 2020 06:11pm
Quote (Skinned @ Feb 25 2020 04:02pm)
You don't know what I do in my home. I can pay taxes and separate my trash while bringing my own bags to the grocery.

I give money to the organizations I'm 'maligning'. ECO locally and Sierra Club nationally. I also participate in other charities that would not be effective in combating climate change poverty or inequality on a large scale. They are a Band-Aid on a cancer.

By your logic a person with schizophrenia should just go to church and not have state sponsored case management available with medicaid paying for psychotropic meds and to keep someone out of institutions. Or that going to church is the same thing as assertive community treatment and the difference is preference when the difference is efficacy too.

I'm not saying that your hydro flask activism has no place. Sk sk sk.


the best balance is legislation to ensure better air and water quality and private organizations dealing with issues on a local level. I live in the reality of the country with hundreds of miles of uncleaned highways and roads that are in shit shape from asshats. many of these are right winged organizations or church groups dealing with things I find most Bernie voters cant even conceptualize. they find tax dollars sufficient, if that's not u then good. im just a bit tired of the right doesn't care about the environment because they don't want to spend millions legislating American pollution from industry to mexico on our dime as the consumer. its pass the green deal or youre an environment hater in all too many circles of people who cant sit in an open air park without grabbing their phone for a selfie inside of 45 seconds.
Member
Posts: 19,269
Joined: Nov 9 2005
Gold: 282.67
Feb 25 2020 08:32pm
I think Steyer might be your guy for green
Member
Posts: 26,025
Joined: Jun 14 2006
Gold: 5,300.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 26 2020 08:08am
Matt Gaetz
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev191011
Add Reply New Topic New Poll