you're more than free to say they're not as similar as i think, you're just not free to say they aren't comparable.

mainly because by questioning the level of similarity they are you're comparing them.

do you understand now? has it sunk in how that phrase is just something you read without realizing it's paradoxical?

honestly i wish i never pointed it out, i would prefer you to say things that make you sound silly.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 24 2019 02:16pm

It's amazing how you default into your comfort zone and crawl into the fetal position when someone addresses you directly with logic.

you claimed that you learned the lesson that words can have two (or even more) different meanings, but apparently it went straight over your head. seriously, i urge you to think that 'logic' of yours through, and you'll realise just HOW incredibly flawed it is...

couldn't make that shit up, haha...

This post was edited by fender on Jul 24 2019 02:19pm

words can have more than one meaning. im just using the definition you posted. if you have a definition that says comparable means the opposite of comparable (instead of links to idiots saying it on the internet) plz post it.

"those aren't comparable" is just a phrase, not a definition. and phrases range from clever and factually correct to just stupid things stupid people say. kind of a monkey see monkey do thing, which is a more clever phrase.

people like you are the reason "awesome" went from meaning something akin to seeing Victoria Falls for the first time down to the throwaway phrase you toss at a gas station clerk because they have a pack with the 50 cent off coupon on it still.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 24 2019 02:28pm

now you're just being obtuse. i made it perfectly clear that i used the "similar / like" definition of the word, and disagreed both investigations were. you're using the 'suited for comparison / able to be compared' definition (illustrated by your creek / mississipi example, and claiming that by comparing both i'd prove they ARE indeed comparable), which is of course also a correct definition, but clearly not the one i meant.
seriously, you're so desperate to prove i used a wrong word, that you don't even notice how stupid you'd have to be to not only ignore the context, but also a detailed explanation (including a dictionary definition), in order to make that claim. seriously, you just went full...



the fact that you're now going into boomer mode, preparing the pivot to 'i don't like that language changes, that words can have a different meaning than the single one i personally know and accept' proves that you're at least beginning to realise you were wrong - even though you obviously can't admit it...

When you parade around here like a condescending asshole for the better part of two years, insinuating all the cultists [anyone who wasn’t suffering from TDS] are morons for actually believing that Trump didn’t collude with Russia. To the point where you openly proclaim you believe there was an 80% chance that Trump & co colluded with Russia to affect the 2016 election. At this point you don’t really have a choice but to attempt to save-face, act like the whole thing was a matter of national security, & didn’t actually turn out to be almost complete bullshit, not admit you were blatantly fucking wrong, but attempt some pathetic “neither side is satisfied narrative” & go down with the sinking TDS ship.

I raised several similarities that are inarguable on purpose

also, now you're using pivot wrong.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 24 2019 03:33pm

That Benghazi investigation was the most successful Republican fund raiser in their party history. But it was nothing but a fundraiser.

Can you say that the Mueller investigation has been nothing but a fund raiser for the Democratic Party?

My favorite part is all the Trump subordinates getting incarcerated for covering up and obstructing an investigation where nothing was illegal to begin when. Peace out cucks lol.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jul 24 2019 03:15pm

Drumpf is finished

Well, if it wasn't for OLC, Trump would be wearing stripes. Case closed on that. We all know he is a criminal at heart, he is lucky he won the election.

Sorry if facts are considered TDS, I guess I have it! I dont like criminals serving in the highest office. Hopefully he will be arrested the second he leaves office.