Wait, wut? You believe that Truther crap?

I'm not gonna put forth a lot of effort when he's baiting me. Snipa was right when he said:



Loose Change is what all these Truther clowns start with, and it's been debunked seven different ways from Sunday.



I'm the younger, better looking brother.



Wow, I missed this. You don't get to talk about education and "physics proving" a conspiracy, because you clearly don't understand physics if you're saying that it explains the towers' collapse.

This post was edited by Santara on Sep 12 2018 04:54pm

Dej?

They both probably got eye cancer

Lel

simple but made me lol

low hanging fruit/10

The "debunking" that followed thoses stupid loose change videos is even more stupid than the videos it is supposed to debunk .. none of them are even close to satisfy me.
I dont have problems with towers collapsing, heated steel over 400°celsius is -30% mecanic resistance if i remember correctly ? building could have had some flaws too as it was already "old".
Furthermore NIST study explained well how WT7 collapsed due to the same reason and how the video of the so called "freefall" was a cutted video no showing left side falling first.

There are still unsolved questions,
1 : how does a commercial plane can support 500+ mph at low altitude without his wings exploding ?
Hell, that's even more interesting with pentagone because they say it runned into it with an absurd approach not higher than 25-30 meters, breaking some streetlights on its passage at the speed of 500-600 mph ?
As I couldnt find the numbers about "force de portance" of such an airbus wings, I asked that question to some physicists and nobody could explain me how the plane went right to its target without his wings getting smashed by the air density at that altitude.

The only possibility left seems that planes would have been drones with reinforced aluminium wings or something else. It is just suppositions and I'm not even sure. But I know the official story is lying.
2 : Where is that fucking plane hitting the pentagone ? Where are thoses 2 tons rolls royce engines ? cant find them ? so unlucky ..

Does people really believe something they don't see ? I mean beside religions people

This post was edited by Melatonina on Sep 13 2018 09:07am

Then you aren't being objective.

1. Commercial airplanes regularly travel about .89-.93 mach. 500 mph is well short of mach at sea level (approximately 760 mph, or .66 mach). The wings don't have to be reinforced to withstand this, they're already designed to. Wings are engineered to withstand far greater stresses than lamp poles.

2. There's a wealth of photographic evidence of an airplane hitting the Pentagon.

Here's a photo of a flight 77 engine: