Seriously, go read a book about I.Q. testing. Take a general psychology class. Go ahead and actually do some research on the topic.
No esteemed psychologists put serious weight into the accuracy of I.Q. tests because of the number of lurking variables.

Blacks vote for a white guy in proportions greater than 90% - therefore not racist.
Blacks vote for a black guy in proportions greater than 90% - therefore racist.

Straw man is where?

yea wtv,


and yea, the g factor is unfalsifiable cuz its a priori of the experiment


every single IQ test is done assuming the g factor exists


falsifying the g factor would be like trying to falsify that a correlation isnt a correlation, nonsense

Right. It's just another coincidence that the race with the lowest intelligence is genetically different.

Correlation definitely equals causation, you're right.

It's always nice to get a perspective from 1892, so thanks for stopping by.

There's no doubt that blacks are genetically different from whites or any other race.



Because there was no black man in the race with the white man. :/

This post was edited by AEtheric on May 17 2012 05:54pm

stfu noob

u know nothing

btw, ur at the bottom of the white race's intellectual hierarchy, so that makes you stupider than most black ppl, how does that make you feel

When a black Republican makes it to the national stage and gets 90+% of black votes, we can talk. Otherwise, the fact that Obama's numbers were nearly indistinguishable from other Democrats doesn't speak to anything except for the strength of the Democratic party among black voters (which isn't exactly a surprise.)

Vouch

If the same reaction is observed with only 1 variable, how can you come to 2 different conclusions?