you dug a little too hard to think of something to say there. If you did not understand what I meant you should be put down.
the idea that we could fly was a theory. Science and math was used to prove it could be done, but it was failed many times. Until someone actually took flight, it was only a theory. now it is a fact, proven 100%.
theories get proven or stay theories. period.

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on May 21 2010 09:41pm

Do you know what the word theory means? Because apparently you don't.

you 2 make my brain hurt, i used the word theory as a reference to all 3 ideas being currently un-proven.
I am not trying to study the word theory. seriously trolls, quit trollin.

some seem to disagree though.



This post was edited by tagged4nothing on May 21 2010 10:00pm

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-fact.html

Read it, please.

There is no such thing as divergent evolution. Fish do not become monkeys. However, fish can become other kinds of fish and monkeys can become other kinds of primates over time. The Bible says it perfectly "God created each animal OF IT'S KIND" - so, yeah, evolution is real but divergent evolution is not.








(This is the only Christian evolution argument I have ever heard that would make some sense if they were right about creation to begin with)

They are theories in two different senses. One is a theory in American vernacular terms, meaning it's an unproven hypothesis (creationism), and the other is a scientific theory, meaning it's a proven hypothesis or a fact (evolution).

This post was edited by Nihlathak on May 21 2010 10:03pm

noun

1. a piece of information about circumstances that exist or events that have occurred; first you must collect all the facts of the case; he supported his argument with an impressive array of facts; your fears have no basis in fact; how much of the story is fact and how much fiction is hard to tell;
2. a statement or assertion of verified information about something that is the case or has happened;
3. an event known to have happened or something known to have existed;
4. a concept whose truth can be proved; scientific hypotheses are not facts;

read this please. unless you are also trying to bitch about me using theory to link all 3 ideas. my bad people, you are caught up on the wrong point if so.
I should perhaps something a little more clear. I am not debating the fact evolution exists, more I am stating that life started from evolution is a theory, and humans evolving from anything is still a theory.




bacon doesn't become a sandwich until other particles combine with it too. bacon can evolve into a sandwich(matter of speaking, don't define evolution from this).
second of all what? for example, lets saythe tiger and the lion eats the antelope. now lets say there are no more antelope and the tigers and lions have to hunt each other. it is possible that one may change it's traits to more of a dog, and perhaps one day become the really big wolf hunting the the kitty cat. I could be wrong on how that all goes, but it does seem to make sense to me. I could be misunderstanding you though now re-reading your statement.
I am unsure if you are thinking this or if you suggested some people may think this way.

This post was edited by tagged4nothing on May 21 2010 10:18pm

God how can you be so incredibly dense. Evolution is a theory of life, aka it doesn't exclude humans (because we're obviously living). And it's a scientific theory, and a fact; it's not just a theory like you're supposing it is.

And nobody knows where life started from; evolution doesn't presuppose that we do. It only explains the diversity of life, not its origin.

This post was edited by Nihlathak on May 21 2010 10:17pm