Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ May 15 2010 03:12am)
I use emoticons not to bring pathos to an argument, but merely out of habit from a long time of posting on the internet. The vast majority of them are actually meant in a sarcastic fashion, and you are far from the first to attempt to engage my arguments based on the style of using emoticons rather than on their actual merits. Cute, but I actually expected better of you for some reason.
First of all, I did not know that is why you do that. Second of all, I did not "attempt to engage [your] arguments based on the style of using emoticons rather than on their actual merits," but rather, I "engage[d] [your] arguments based on the" belief you were appealing to pathos through the use of emoticons in addition to "engag[ing] [them] on their [lack of] actual merits."
Quote
I am not actually arguing that there should be a split for Greek Macedonia, and rather explicitly stated that I don't think that there needs to be such a split for things to be fair. Had I recalled the FYROM, I would have removed 'immediately' from the discussion entirely.
You only thought the Macedonians in Greece speak a Slavic language and are persecuted by the Greeks because you were thinking about the Macedonians of the Republic of Macedonia; had you realized that the two Macedonian groups are separate and live in different countries, you would have also realized your entire argument is pointless.
Quote
If America passed laws making it illegal to speak Spanish and people were not allowed to name their children "Jose" or "Maria," I would be much much more outraged because it would be happening in my own nation. But those are the abuses that I find outrageous much more than any idea of statehood. I am not saying that Hispanic California - for the sake of your argument - should be split away from America or that it's any less American. Simply that its culture should be respected and there should be no systematic attempts by the state to obliterate it.
Tell me, what are these Greek Macedonian names you speak of, if nothing other than Greek names?
Quote
There is a difference between "Stressing linguistic and ethnic unity" and completely attempting to obliterate a culture with long-standing historical ties to the land within your borders. You can spin it however you want, but Greece is doing their best to destroy a culture and replace it with what they believe "True Greeks" should be.
Again, your whole argument was based on the identification of the Slavic Macedonians with the Greek Macedonians. The Greek Macedonians are today thoroughly assimilated into modern Greece, considering that they speak Greek and share the same national identity as people from Athens or Thessaloniki. In fact, as you can see in this headline:

The former Prime Minister Kostas Karamanlis said, "I myself am a Macedonian, just as another 2.5 million Greeks."
"True Greek" (your scare quotes) culture is exactly what Greece determines it to be, because historically no such unified culture has existed. It is a melange of multiple traditions.
What is true is that Greece has a dispute with the Slavic Macedonians with their naming, but the latter already have their own country, so how can you accuse Greece of "cultural genocide" against any Macedonians? In fact, it would make sense that Greece would be offended that a Slavic people named themselves Macedonians only if a subgroup of the Greeks were themselves already called Macedonians.
This post was edited by Inviction on May 15 2010 02:03pm