d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Charlie Kirk
Prev19101112Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 46,886
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jun 12 2026 07:55am
He picks and chooses to position himself to hold a right wing accountability stance when he, along with everyone else, should aim for total accountability. The issues in our world are not caused by only Republicans, but he feels that way because he is behind this scam that we need to be a divided nation.

So no, he does not make a good point when he chooses to hate one particular side.


but isnt doing any of that
Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Mar 6 2013
Gold: 1,120.00
Jun 12 2026 07:57am
You're free not to like it. You're free to break private associations and avoid people who say things that hurt your feelings.

If you think you should be free to rob them of gainful employment though, you are against free speech. I am for free speech. 20 years ago this made me a lefty, now I'm a righty I guess without my opinion changing whatsoever.


I don’t think the government should be able to force me as a business owner to continue employing someone if I don’t want to be. You’re not for freedom of speech, you’re for freedom from consequences.
Member
Posts: 46,886
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jun 12 2026 07:58am
read it again - if u have questions about the used terminology - pm me and we'll get u sorted friend


why cant you just explain your code yalking to everyone?
Member
Posts: 9,763
Joined: Mar 28 2022
Gold: 37,705.00
Jun 12 2026 08:06am
why cant you just explain your code yalking to everyone?


u r spamming dear - pls pm your personal concerns and obscurities to keep it clean & lean over here.
Member
Posts: 46,886
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jun 12 2026 08:16am
u r spamming dear - pls pm your personal concerns and obscurities to keep it clean & lean over here.


post your code in public and wow everyone
Member
Posts: 19,168
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
Jun 12 2026 09:49am
but ^Sankturio isnt doing any of that


None of them are. It's just pure one side nonsense.
Member
Posts: 17,273
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Jun 12 2026 10:56am
my position is that it doesnt matter what his job is, it only matters if what he did out of work is now spilling into the workplace. so whether he's a firefighter or gas station worker is irrelevant. but if people are calling the firehouse, or gas station, and making the workplace a worse place for all of Joe's coworkers then i see zero issue with an employer letting them go. its the unfortunate world we live in. the people calling the workplace demanding joe be fired are idiots, and i wouldnt even defend their actions in doing that outside of some really drastic circumstances, but i see zero issue with the employer letting joe go. sorry joe, you didnt do it on the job, but its now affecting your job.

these examples also dont cover any number of more nuances. like if a legal prosecutor got caught making a racist tirade off the job they should be let go, because what they did wasnt on the clock but shows a potential negative bias towards some of the people they will need to service on the job. in a way that neither a firefighter or gas station worker is likely to have any issues of bias. its one of the reasons we see a lot of witchhunts aimed at politicians, they're meant to represent their constituents, and if they have biases against some that's bad. and that goes for racist old whiteys in the south and racist young black politicians in big cities. both are bad imo, so if they step out of line and say something dumb i wont defend their right to stay in office. sorry we dont like you we can pressure you to resign or remove you legally.


You're really confusing the issue here. Are the people calling to complain about Joe the issue or is Joe the issue?

This post makes it sound like you agree with me, that the whiny cunts are the problem.
Member
Posts: 17,273
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Jun 12 2026 10:57am
I don’t think the government should be able to force me as a business owner to continue employing someone if I don’t want to be. You’re not for freedom of speech, you’re for freedom from consequences.


Lol seriously? So if I own a restaurant you think I should be allowed to fire people for being black or having small tits?

You were right all along, I'm an out-of-control righty because I believe in equality and freedom of expression.
Member
Posts: 92,928
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jun 12 2026 11:03am
You're really confusing the issue here. Are the people calling to complain about Joe the issue or is Joe the issue?

This post makes it sound like you agree with me, that the whiny cunts are the problem.


well we mostly agreed to begin with, i just see a line, and you see no line. ever.

not trying to put words in your mouth, so can you think of any example no matter how extreme where a person could say something while not on ANY job but then rightfully lose their job?
Member
Posts: 17,273
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Jun 12 2026 11:11am
well we mostly agreed to begin with, i just see a line, and you see no line. ever.

not trying to put words in your mouth, so can you think of any example no matter how extreme where a person could say something while not on ANY job but then rightfully lose their job?


Yeah, if you say something that lands you in jail
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev19101112Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll