Atm no but they want to speed up path to citizenship right now for this exact reason since election is coming up in 2025 and there's zero ways Liberals win unless this pass and all the millions slaves can vote for whoever let them in.

Yeah because their genetic constitutions are different, AT LEAST with respect to skin pigmentation. You're trying to say the genetic constitutions aren't different which is insane on its face. I'm not talking about "genome type", whatever you mean by that - we are all Homo Sapien no?

OK yeah, but the point is you're not being replaced because of your skin color, you're being replaced because you're more demanding. Middle class whites obviously don't want to pick strawberries or serve Tim Hortons for 15 bucks and hour. Even in the corporate world, middle class whites want good work life balance and want higher wages, it's easier to bring in Chinese or Indians to suppress these asks.

I get what you mean, it's just when you're part of a country who used to be typically white/black/first gen migrants and so on and now you have to deal with millions of new slaves from the exact same regions and your typical kids/adults can't even find job because all corporations want to hire slaves, you can see the great replacement for a movement that want to remove your typical citizens from the equation for low value slaves. Kids who want to get their first job in the fast food industry/tim hortons/walmart cant because they are all 100% indians staffed now and will never hire someone who can't speak punjabi. Once one of em get a job in management, they sell positions to people of their own for multiple thousands (lmia) to get their PR. Indians make massive amount of $ in our own country by selling jobs to their own so they can get citizenship while sending all that $ back to India. It's literally fucking the Canadian economy. Usa is next. They already moving there in mass through illegal ways.

This post was edited by iLoveMyUsername on Aug 7 2024 04:59pm

There are only 3 different genomes that differ from one another in human DNA. That's what I'm talking about. Skin pigmentation IS different, yes. What I'm saying is; a white person with dark hair and a dark tan is still a white person. Arab & Indian is most similarly matched to white (Caucasian) than anything else. And it's not even close.
Let's not think of it in colors. Think of it as the genome type. Mongloid, Caucasoid and Negroid. That's all we got

This post was edited by JaggerSwagger74 on Aug 7 2024 05:00pm

What they're doing (roughly as you described before) is transferring wealth from whites to all other races (except East Asians because you know, white-adjacent model minorities) by aggressive treachery, subversion, and in some cases violence. Let's recap:

>White youth being brainwashed into sterilizing themselves or otherwise not reproducing, of which one member who posted here is a victim
>Transfering wealth from white people to foreign invaders through selective taxation & benefit disbursement
>Censorship of white voices across the media & brutal suppression of white racial consciousness
>Two-tier policing with respect to crime (UK is the worst example atm), whites get the book thrown at them for petty crime while foreign invaders have judicial impunity
>Displacement of whites from their ancestral territories through injection of foreign invaders via points 2 (tax money) and 4 (brutalized until the whites get the message and leave)

This is all textbook genocide (or replacement, these words are equivalent in this context). It's literally an ongoing genocide.

The reason why they hate us is exactly what you opened with, we hold most of the wealth. Remember this was the motivation for the Rwandan genocide of the Tutsis. They hate us because we are ordered, disciplined, and successful (on average). They are envious of our beauty. This harkens back to Genesis - why does Cain kill Abel?

What they ultimately want is, which we are in agreeance, a population of weak people dependent on the government (which they control absolutely, elections are a sham and will continue to be utilized to fool the midwits)

I think we're arguing about different things. What I'm saying is that there is a logical genetic hierarchy which goes something like: homo sapien -> Caucasoid mongoloid and negroid -> other sub-races like Arab, Germanic, Persian etc. So Arabs and Germanics are still genetically different even if they both fall under the caucasoid umbrella, but they're more similar to each other than they are to the other 2 groups

Right, shoulds, coulds etc. Not a reflection of reality at all but rather some dempt up utopia. Our system will certainly not allow for that given Quebec and NDP. You're going to have a minority Conservative government and even then they're not anti mass immigration. Perhaps you could call the bloc a centre left. So certainly the take away shouldn't be get rid of the politicians because that's not remotely feisable and thus the best alternative is dealing with reality and administering what we have significantly better.

Better go work in what you actually have vs some drempt up scenario I figure

To be clear if you're not Canadian. The peoples party is not gaining significant traction ever here regardless of thoughts on voter sentiment. So you're left with what you have.

This post was edited by SBD on Aug 7 2024 05:26pm

That's a bit too simplistic imho. First, it is definitely possible to have economic growth with a stagnant population based on increased productivity/technological progress. Second, this notion that our societies need constant growth to stave off collapse is only true due to excessive and ongoing debt-making. Third, there are actually plenty of first world nations whose population has been relatively constant for the past couple of decades and which still did perfectly fine.



I guess Japan's case will be instructive in this regard. They're one of the first countries in the world to reach the phase of sizable demographic decline. Their population is currently shrinking by some 600k people per year. And they don't seem inclined to start engaging in "replacement migration". Their current net migration numbers are +100k per year, they would need to increase that number six- or seven-fold to keep their overall population level stable. Not gonna happen. So they'll provide a case study for how a first world society can cope with this kind of shrinking.

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/japan-population/

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Aug 7 2024 05:23pm

That's what I'm getting at basically, yes. At the very most base level, they are more similar to eachother than the other two.